Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB443

Introduced
1/21/25  
Refer
1/21/25  
Report Pass
2/10/25  

Caption

Relating To The University Of Hawaii At Hilo.

Summary

HB443 appropriates state general funds for the University of Hawaii at Hilo to support student enrollment and retention efforts. Specifically, the bill would fund one retention coordinator position, one internship coordinator position, and broader student enrollment management initiatives at UH Hilo for fiscal years 2025-2026 and 2026-2027. The bill’s findings state that UH Hilo has experienced declining fall enrollment for three consecutive years and that the campus faces challenges such as limited brand exposure outside Hawaii, difficulty retaining mainland students, and competition from online education options. The measure is framed as a response to those enrollment challenges and to the absence of these requested positions and initiatives from the governor’s executive budget. It directs appropriations from the general revenues of the State of Hawaii, with the exact dollar amounts left blank in the bill text, and requires the University of Hawaii to expend the funds for the stated purposes. The bill also includes a delayed effective date of July 1, 3000, which is a placeholder commonly used in draft legislation rather than a practical implementation date. In terms of impact on state law, HB443 would create a new, targeted appropriation in the state budget for UH Hilo rather than amend substantive education statutes. If enacted, it would increase state spending and authorize the university to hire or support staff and programs intended to improve student retention, internship access, and enrollment management. The practical effect would be to dedicate public funds to a campus-specific enrollment strategy at the University of Hawaii at Hilo. The general sentiment reflected in the bill text is supportive of UH Hilo and its need for additional resources. The findings emphasize urgency and necessity, suggesting the legislature views the positions and initiatives as important tools for stabilizing and growing enrollment. No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no additional evidence of opposition or debate in the available materials. The main point of potential contention is fiscal: the bill would require new general fund spending for a single campus, and the findings note that similar requests were not included in the governor’s executive budget. That suggests the likely debate would center on budget priorities, whether the state should fund campus-specific positions, and whether these enrollment challenges are best addressed through appropriations of this kind. Another possible issue is the bill’s blank appropriation amounts, which indicates the funding level was still unresolved in the draft.

Impact

HB443 would add a new state general fund appropriation for the University of Hawaii at Hilo, authorizing money for a retention coordinator, an internship coordinator, and student enrollment management initiatives over two fiscal years. It does not appear to amend existing statutes governing higher education; instead, it would operate as a budgetary appropriation directing the University of Hawaii to use the funds for enrollment and retention support at UH Hilo.

Sentiment

The bill’s tone is strongly supportive of the University of Hawaii at Hilo and its efforts to address declining enrollment. The findings present the campus’s situation as a serious concern and justify state intervention through targeted funding. Because no committee discussion or votes were provided, the available record shows no explicit opposition, but the bill itself signals a legislative preference for investing in retention and enrollment management.

Contention

The likely contention is over whether the state should allocate general funds to a single campus for staffing and enrollment initiatives, especially when the governor’s executive budget did not include these requests. Fiscal concerns, competing budget priorities, and the effectiveness of campus-specific spending are the most probable points of debate. The blank appropriation amounts in the draft also suggest unresolved disagreement or incomplete budget negotiations.

Companion Bills

HI SB636

Same As Relating To The University Of Hawaii At Hilo.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.