Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB224

Introduced
1/19/23  
Refer
1/23/23  
Report Pass
2/17/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Refer
3/9/23  

Caption

Relating To Noise Control.

Impact

The proposed changes will amend existing laws, particularly those relating to traffic and emergency period violations. If passed, county ordinances related to noise control will be enforceable as civil infractions rather than criminal offenses, thereby reducing the burden on the legal system while promoting adherence to noise regulations. This approach is expected to lead to more efficient management of minor infractions, ultimately making the judicial system more streamlined and less costly for the state and residents.

Summary

Senate Bill 224 aims to address noise pollution in Hawaii by establishing a framework for treating noise control infractions similarly to existing traffic violations. The bill proposes that these infractions be adjudicated through the district and family court systems, streamlining the judicial process and enabling counties to enforce noise regulations without criminal penalties. This approach supports local governance by allowing counties to set reasonable limits on noise levels, thus enhancing the quality of life for residents affected by excessive noise.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB224 appears to be generally supportive among proponents who view the legislation as a practical solution to a pressing societal issue. Many advocates argue that addressing noise pollution through civil infraction processes will alleviate public grievances regarding excessive noise while also conserving judicial resources. Nevertheless, there are concerns from some local leaders about the potential for state-level decision-making to undermine local authority in crafting noise regulations tailored to specific community needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention include how the bill balances state authority with local control over noise regulations. Critics express concern that preempting local ordinances in favor of a state framework could dilute community efforts to combat particularly challenging noise issues unique to their environments. The implementation timeline, set to take effect in July 2050, has also led to debate over the urgency of addressing noise pollution when many consider it an immediate public concern.

Companion Bills

HI HB123

Same As Relating To Noise Control.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

TX HB1615

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain local laws concerning water and wastewater special districts, including a conforming amendment.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon

TX HB1620

Relating to nonsubstantive additions to, revisions of, and corrections in enacted codes, to the nonsubstantive codification or disposition of various laws omitted from enacted codes, and to conforming codifications enacted by the 88th Legislature to other Acts of that legislature.

NJ S1701

Requires legislative approval of changes to core curriculum content standards and Statewide assessments.

NJ A167

Requires legislative approval of changes to core curriculum content standards and Statewide assessments.