Senate Resolution 113 is a commemorative resolution recognizing and commending Georgia’s Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs). The resolution recites the history of CRNAs in Georgia, noting their presence at Grady Hospital as early as 1916 and the founding of the Georgia Association of Nurse Anesthetists in 1938. It highlights the profession’s long-standing role in providing anesthesia and perioperative care across a wide range of settings, including hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, doctors’ and dentists’ offices, endoscopy suites, and the VA healthcare system.
The resolution emphasizes the clinical and public-service contributions of CRNAs, describing them as trusted advanced practice registered nurses who administer anesthesia, sedation, IV sedation, general anesthesia, and pain management. It also underscores their importance in rural areas, where they often serve as the primary or sole anesthesia providers and help reduce travel burdens for patients who might otherwise need to travel long distances for care. The measure does not change substantive law; it is a formal expression of appreciation by the Senate and directs that copies be distributed to the public and press.
Impact
SR 113 has no direct effect on Georgia statutes, regulations, licensing rules, or reimbursement policy. Its legal impact is limited to an official legislative commendation, but it may have symbolic value by elevating the visibility of CRNAs and their role in rural and hospital-based anesthesia care. The resolution could be relevant to professional recognition and public awareness, but it does not create rights, duties, or funding obligations for any state agency or healthcare provider.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment around the resolution is strongly positive and supportive. The text is celebratory throughout, portraying CRNAs as highly trusted, cost-effective, and essential healthcare professionals who serve Georgia citizens in both urban and rural settings. No votes or committee transcripts are provided, but the resolution’s unanimous tone and commendatory language indicate broad appreciation rather than controversy.
Contention
There is no recorded contention in the provided materials, and the resolution itself is noncontroversial in nature. Because it is a recognition measure rather than a policy bill, it does not appear to raise disputes over scope of practice, anesthesia regulation, rural healthcare staffing, or physician supervision. Any potential policy debates about CRNA practice are not addressed in the text or accompanying history.