State Government; use or installation of any artificial intelligence system on state equipment when the company that developed or deployed such artificial intelligence system is associated with the People's Republic of China; prohibit
Impact
By implementing this bill, Georgia would be taking a significant step towards ensuring that its technology systems are secure from potential foreign surveillance or influence. This could set a precedent for how state governments across the U.S. approach the use of technology developed by foreign entities. The bill may lead to increased scrutiny of technology partners and vendors that engage with state contracts, particularly those from China, thus reshaping the landscape for subcontracting and procurement processes.
Summary
Senate Bill 104 aims to amend Chapter 29 of Title 50 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated by prohibiting the use or installation of any artificial intelligence system on state equipment if the system was developed or deployed by a company associated with the People's Republic of China. The bill seeks to address concerns about security and influence from foreign entities in the state's technological infrastructure. Specifically, it establishes criteria for identifying companies associated with China and provides definitions related to the legislation, such as what constitutes an 'artificial intelligence system.'
Contention
The bill may face contention from various stakeholders, including technology companies that could be disproportionately impacted by restrictions on their ability to contract with the state. There could be debates regarding the implications of such a ban on innovation and the development of artificial intelligence solutions, as the technology rapidly evolves and is often global in nature. Critics might argue that this could limit competition and access to potentially beneficial technology that may improve state services or operations.
Establishes the artificial intelligence training data transparency act requiring developers of generative artificial intelligence models or services to post on the developer's website information regarding the data used by the developer to train the generative artificial intelligence model or service, including a high-level summary of the datasets used in the development of such system or service.
Artificial intelligence; Responsible Deployment of AI Systems Act; AI Council; AI Regulatory Sandbox Program; Artificial Intelligence Workforce Development Program; effective date.
Artificial intelligence; Responsible Deployment of AI Systems Act; AI Council; AI Regulatory Sandbox Program; Artificial Intelligence Workforce Development Program; effective date.
Establishes the artificial intelligence training data transparency act requiring developers of generative artificial intelligence models or services to post on the developer's website information regarding the data used by the developer to train the generative artificial intelligence model or service, including a high-level summary of the datasets used in the development of such system or service.