Georgia House Bill HR849

Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/28/25
• Enrolled: 3/28/25
• Passed: 3/28/25

Caption

Mapes, Trooper First Class; commend

Summary

House Resolution 849 is a commemorative resolution recognizing and commending Trooper First Class Mapes for his actions during a dangerous incident on November 30, 2024, in Rockdale County. The resolution recounts that Trooper Mapes and a trainee observed two vehicles racing at high speed, pursued one of them after it exited the interstate, and encountered fleeing occupants; during the foot chase, the passenger allegedly fired a handgun at Mapes, who returned fire and continued the pursuit despite being struck by gunfire. The resolution also highlights the actions of Trooper Cadet South, who abandoned pursuit of the driver and ran toward the active gunfire to assist Mapes. It praises both officers for courage, selflessness, and dedication to public safety, and notes Mapes’ prior recognition, including awards naming him Trooper of the Year for the South Region and for the United States. The measure directs the House Clerk to provide a copy of the resolution to Trooper Mapes.

Impact

HR 849 does not change state law, create new duties, or appropriate funds; it is a ceremonial House resolution. Its practical effect is to formally recognize Trooper First Class Mapes and, by extension, commend law enforcement service in Georgia. The resolution has no direct impact on statutes or regulatory requirements, but it serves as an official expression of appreciation by the House of Representatives.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the resolution is strongly positive and supportive. The text is written in laudatory terms, emphasizing bravery, public service, and sacrifice, and the available context shows no recorded opposition, committee controversy, or recorded votes. The measure appears to have been presented as a straightforward commendation of law enforcement heroism.

Contention

There is no notable contention reflected in the bill text or the available legislative history. Because the resolution is purely honorary, it does not appear to have generated debate over policy, funding, or legal changes. Any potential disagreement would likely be limited to broader views about law enforcement, but no such dispute is documented in the provided materials.