Laremont, Dr. Benjamin; honoring life, legacy, and service; condolences; Dr. Benjamin Laremont Day; designate October18, 2026
House Resolution 1984 is a commemorative resolution honoring the life, legacy, and public service of Dr. Benjamin Laremont. It recounts his upbringing in Panama, his education at Meharry Medical College, his service as a physician in the U.S. military, and his medical career in multiple states, including his role as the first Black doctor at Peoria Methodist Medical Center. The resolution also highlights his long practice in Georgia, where he served patients in Duluth and other communities, and notes his faith, family life, and perseverance while living with Parkinson’s disease.
The resolution formally recognizes Dr. Laremont’s contributions to medicine, community service, and the State of Georgia, and designates October 18, 2026, as Dr. Benjamin Laremont Day. It also directs the House Clerk to provide a copy of the resolution to his family. As a ceremonial measure, it does not create or amend substantive law, but it serves as an official expression of appreciation and remembrance by the Georgia House of Representatives.
HR 1984 has no regulatory or fiscal effect and does not amend the Georgia Code or alter state agency duties. Its legal impact is limited to a formal legislative recognition of Dr. Benjamin Laremont and the designation of a commemorative day, with the only administrative action being delivery of the resolution to his family. The measure affects no private rights, public benefits, or statutory programs.
The tone of the resolution is strongly positive and celebratory, reflecting unanimous respect for Dr. Laremont’s medical career, service, and community impact. Because the bill is a tribute resolution rather than a policy measure, the available context shows no recorded opposition, debate, or vote-related controversy. The overall sentiment is one of honor, gratitude, and commemoration.
There is no notable contention in the available record. The resolution is noncontroversial and purely ceremonial, so there are no competing policy positions, amendments, or stakeholder disputes reflected in the text or context. Any discussion would likely center on the appropriateness of honoring Dr. Laremont’s achievements rather than on legislative disagreement.