Williams, Cheryl Annette; honoring the life and memory; condolences
Summary
House Resolution 1806 is a commemorative resolution honoring the life and memory of Cheryl Annette Williams, who passed away on January 9, 2026. The resolution recounts her Georgia roots, her family life, her long marriage to George Williams, her faith and church involvement, and her leadership within the Democratic Party at the local and state levels, including service as vice chair of the Gwinnett County Democrats and chair of the Seventh Congressional District in the Georgia Democratic Party.
The resolution expresses the House’s condolences and formally recognizes Williams’s character, community service, and personal integrity. It also directs the Clerk of the House to provide a copy of the resolution to her family. As a memorial resolution, it does not create or amend substantive law, but serves as an official legislative tribute and expression of sympathy on behalf of the House of Representatives.
Impact
HR 1806 has no regulatory or fiscal impact and does not amend the Georgia Code or alter state policy. Its legal effect is limited to an official House expression of condolence and recognition, with the Clerk authorized to distribute a copy to the family of Cheryl Annette Williams. The resolution affects no private parties beyond the symbolic acknowledgment of her life and service.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly respectful and sympathetic. The bill text is entirely laudatory, emphasizing Williams’s faith, family devotion, integrity, kindness, and community leadership. No votes, committee transcripts, or recorded opposition are provided, and the available context suggests a noncontroversial measure intended to honor a deceased community leader.
Contention
There is no notable contention reflected in the bill text or the available legislative history. Because the resolution is a memorial tribute rather than a policy measure, it does not present substantive disagreements over law or spending. Any discussion would likely center only on the appropriateness and wording of the tribute, but no such disputes are shown in the record provided.