Givens, Lewis, Sr.; honoring the life and memory; condolences
Summary
House Resolution 1801 is a commemorative resolution honoring the life and memory of Lewis Givens Sr. The resolution recounts his birth in 1899, his marriage to Malinda Atkins-Givens, and the family legacy they built together through eight children and multiple generations of descendants. It also highlights his faith, including his membership at St. Marks Primitive Baptist Church, and his involvement in fraternal and community organizations such as the Masonic Brothers of Cherry Hill 549, AFRO American Lodge #14, and the University Pallbearers Lodge.
The resolution expresses the House’s respect for Mr. Givens’s long life of devotion to family, church, and community, and formally conveys condolences to his family and loved ones. It directs the Clerk of the House to provide an appropriate copy of the resolution to the family. As a ceremonial measure, it does not create new policy, appropriate funds, or amend any statutes.
Impact
HR 1801 has no substantive impact on state law, regulations, or agency operations. It is a nonbinding honorary resolution that serves to recognize an individual’s life and accomplishments, record the legislature’s condolences, and authorize distribution of the resolution to the family. No statutes are amended, no legal rights or duties are changed, and no fiscal or administrative obligations are imposed beyond the clerical act of transmitting the resolution.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly positive and respectful. The bill language is celebratory and memorial in tone, emphasizing faith, family, service, and community legacy. Because the measure is purely honorary, there is no evidence of partisan or policy-based opposition in the provided materials, and the context suggests a routine, consensual tribute by the House.
Contention
There are no notable points of contention in the text or available legislative history. The resolution is a memorial tribute rather than a policy bill, and the context includes no committee debate, recorded votes, or amendments. Any discussion would likely have centered only on the appropriateness of honoring Mr. Givens’s life and legacy, with no indication of disagreement among members.