Hubler, Ricardo "Ric"; honoring the life and memory; condolences
Summary
House Resolution 1798 is a commemorative resolution honoring the life and memory of Ricardo "Ric" Hubler, who died at age 51. The resolution recounts his background, including his upbringing in Ohio, academic achievements at Tulane University and Georgia State University, and his professional leadership roles in Georgia, such as at Georgia Tech, the Metro Atlanta Chamber, and Aprio. It also highlights his service to the National Association of Chinese Americans, Atlanta Chapter, and his reputation for generosity, reliability, compassion, and devotion to family and community.
The resolution does not create new policy, appropriate funds, or amend any Georgia statutes. Its practical effect is ceremonial: it formally expresses the House of Representatives’ condolences and recognition of Hubler’s contributions, and it directs the Clerk of the House to provide a copy of the resolution to his family. As a result, the bill affects no regulated parties and has no legal or fiscal impact beyond the official memorialization.
Impact
HR 1798 has no substantive impact on state law, regulations, or public programs. It is a purely honorary House resolution that serves to memorialize an individual and authorize distribution of the resolution to the family. No statutes are amended, no agencies are directed to act, and no rights or obligations are created for any person or entity.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the resolution is uniformly respectful and sympathetic. The text reflects admiration for Hubler’s professional accomplishments, community involvement, and personal qualities, and the House’s action is framed as an expression of mourning and gratitude. Because there were no recorded committee discussions or votes provided, there is no evidence of opposition or divided sentiment in the available record.
Contention
There is no apparent contention in the available materials. The resolution is noncontroversial and ceremonial in nature, and no committee debate, amendments, or recorded votes are included. Any discussion would likely have centered only on honoring Hubler’s life and contributions rather than on policy differences or legal effects.