House Resolution 1707 is a nonbinding resolution that encourages the creation of the Georgia Legislative Golf Caucus. It states that golf is an important part of Georgia’s economy, tourism, cultural identity, and outdoor recreation, and it highlights the state’s nationally recognized tournaments, golf destinations, and related industries. The resolution also emphasizes golf’s role in youth engagement, workforce development, and public recreation, citing programs such as First Tee, U.S. Kids Golf, and PGA Jr. League.
The resolution provides that membership in the proposed caucus would be voluntary and open to all members of the General Assembly. It also authorizes the caucus to elect its own leadership, adopt procedures, and collaborate with golf-related organizations, courses, tourism entities, and youth programs across the state. The Clerk of the House is directed to distribute copies of the resolution to stakeholders in the Georgia golf community.
Impact
HR 1707 does not amend the Georgia Code or create a new statutory program; instead, it expresses legislative support for forming an informal caucus within the General Assembly. Its practical effect would be to organize interested lawmakers around golf-related policy, promotion, and outreach, while potentially strengthening ties between state government and Georgia’s golf, tourism, and youth-development sectors. Any broader policy impact would depend on future actions taken by the caucus or by legislators influenced by it.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment reflected in the resolution is strongly supportive and promotional. The bill frames golf as economically valuable, culturally significant, and beneficial for youth and community development, suggesting broad enthusiasm for creating a caucus to advance those interests. No votes or committee transcripts are available, so there is no recorded opposition or formal debate in the provided materials.
Contention
Because the resolution is largely ceremonial and voluntary, there is little explicit contention in the text or available history. The main implicit point of debate would be whether the General Assembly should devote attention to a sport-specific caucus and associated advocacy, as opposed to other policy priorities. Any concerns would likely center on the appropriateness of legislative involvement in promoting a particular industry or recreational activity, but no specific objections are documented in the provided record.