Elections; certain persons disqualified from holding office pursuant to operation of the United States Constitution shall not be nominated or elected to office; provide
Impact
The introduction of HB 1159 could significantly influence the landscape of electoral eligibility in Georgia. By codifying the disqualification of individuals identified as having engaged in the selection, certification, or voting of presidential elections in violation of established laws, the bill establishes a stricter framework regarding who may run for office. This action may have the effect of directly impacting the careers of various political figures and candidates, potentially altering the political balance within the state if such individuals are barred from elections or nominations.
Summary
House Bill 1159, referred to as the 'Oath Act', aims to amend the Official Code of Georgia Annotated by establishing disqualifications for individuals seeking to hold public office based on participation in actions deemed insurrectionary or subversive. The bill specifically references Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, asserting that any person who has previously taken an oath to support the Constitution and subsequently participates in insurrection is barred from holding any public office, civil or military, in Georgia unless Congress has removed this disability. This legislation seeks to ensure that those disqualified under federal standards are also recognized as such within state law.
Contention
Critics of HB 1159 may argue that the enforcement of such disqualification criteria can be misused politically, leading to accusations of partisanship in the enforcement of electoral laws. There is a concern that this legislation could be a means to eliminate political competition and undermine democratic principles by barring individuals based on interpretations of their past actions or affiliations that could be politically motivated. Furthermore, the vague language surrounding who may be deemed a 'subversive person' could lead to challenges and legal disputes regarding the application of the law.
Public officers and employees; elected officers or officials shall not have their employment terminated solely as a result of being elected to or holding an elected office; provide
To Amend The Freedom Of Information Act Of 1967; And To Exempt Personal Information Of Elected Constitutional Officers, Judicial Officials, Elected County Officials, Elected Municipal Officials, And Their Immediate Family.
In elections of officers, further providing for officers elected; and, in elected officers and elections, providing for newly elected officer training.
In elections of officers, further providing for officers elected; and, in elected officers and elections, providing for newly elected officer training.
In dates of elections and primaries and special elections, further providing for general primary and candidates to be nominated and party officers to be elected.