This bill creates a statewide framework for digital content provenance, with a focus on identifying content generated or altered by artificial intelligence. It amends Florida election law to require online content that purports to feature an electoral candidate to include digital provenance data if it was created by generative AI. The bill defines provenance data as information showing whether content was derived through generative AI and, if so, identifying the tool and developer used.
The bill also establishes a pilot program within the Division of Emergency Management to test provenance data on agency-created images and videos beginning July 1, 2025. The division must place a conspicuous indicator with an encoded link on covered content and report to the Legislature by November 15, 2026 on whether the approach can be scaled and used by other agencies. That pilot program is set to repeal on June 30, 2027.
Impact
The bill would add new statutory requirements in chapters 106, 252, and 501 of the Florida Statutes. It would regulate providers of generative AI tools, social media platforms, and manufacturers of capture devices sold in Florida by requiring provenance data on synthetic content, public tools to detect and read provenance information, retention and display of provenance data on platforms, and device options to record provenance data. It also makes violations an unfair or deceptive trade practice enforceable by the Attorney General, with notice-and-cure procedures before enforcement. In election law, it adds a disclosure requirement for AI-generated candidate-related content, and in emergency management it creates a limited pilot program for state-produced digital media.
Sentiment
The available vote history suggests generally favorable committee support, with the Senate Commerce and Tourism Committee advancing the bill 7-1. The bill’s overall framing is pro-transparency and pro-authenticity, emphasizing consumer awareness, election integrity, and the ability to verify digital media. No committee transcript excerpts were provided, so there is no additional recorded debate to indicate broader support or opposition beyond the committee vote.
Contention
The main points of contention are likely to be the breadth and feasibility of the new compliance obligations. The bill places duties on AI providers, social media platforms, and device manufacturers to generate, retain, display, and make readable provenance data, which could raise implementation, cost, interoperability, and privacy concerns. The privacy issue is addressed in the bill by prohibiting provenance data from including personal identifying information or device-specific identifiers unless the user directs it, but that safeguard may not fully resolve concerns from industry stakeholders. Another likely area of debate is enforcement, since violations are treated as unfair or deceptive acts under consumer protection law and enforced by the Attorney General.
Requires school districts to provide instruction on artificial intelligence; requires Secretary of Higher Education to develop artificial intelligence model curricula.