An Act To Amend Title 29 Of The Delaware Code Relating To The Tourism Advisory Board.
Impact
The elimination of the Tourism Advisory Board will streamline governance related to tourism in Delaware. Supporters of this amendment argue that the state has successfully managed tourism initiatives without the Board's involvement, leading to a focus on more effective and direct management through the Division of Small Business. The decision to disband the Board is seen as a logical step to enhance operational efficiency in promoting Delaware as a tourist destination.
Summary
Senate Bill 137 seeks to amend Title 29 of the Delaware Code by eliminating the Tourism Advisory Board. This decision comes in light of findings from the Joint Legislative Oversight and Sunset Committee, which concluded that the Board, established in 1981, has not fulfilled its statutory duties in recent years. As the Delaware Tourism Office has evolved and improved its capacities, particularly since moving under the Division of Small Business, the need for the Board's advisory function has significantly diminished. The Board has not been referenced in the Tourism Office's reports for at least five years and has had no substantial activities since 2018, effectively rendering it obsolete.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment surrounding SB 137 has been largely favorable among legislators, as evidenced by the unanimous voting record in favor of disbanding the board. Proponents argue that state resources can be better utilized without the constraints of an advisory board that no longer serves a significant purpose. However, some dissenters may voice concerns regarding the loss of diverse insights that a board comprised of tourism professionals could provide, though this perspective has not prominently shaped the public or legislative discourse on the bill.
Contention
While the bill is fundamentally about terminating an advisory board, it raises broader discussions regarding the future structure of tourism governance in Delaware. Critics worry that the absence of the Board will eliminate a platform for stakeholder input in tourism policymaking. Nonetheless, advocates maintain that the existing structure under the Division of Small Business will adequately address tourism management needs without the bureaucratic overhead of a non-functional advisory board.
Relating to the establishment, powers and duties, terms, and governance of certain advisory bodies for programs administered by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation.
Relating to certain advisory entities and work groups under the jurisdiction of the comptroller of public accounts or on which the comptroller's office is represented and to the repeal or redesignation of certain of those entities.
Urging The aha Moku Advisory Committee To Follow Its Adopted Rules Of Practice, Fulfill Its Statutory Duties, Establish Policies To Assure Consistent Standards Of Administrative And Managerial Accountability; And Convening A Working Group To Make Recommendations.
Urging The aha Moku Advisory Committee To Follow Its Adopted Rules Of Practice, Fulfill Its Statutory Duties, Including Complying With The Sunshine Law, Conduct A Performance Review Of Its Executive Director, And Establish Policies To Assure Consistent Standards Of Administrative And Managerial Accountability; And Requesting The Office Of The Auditor To Conduct A Comprehensive Performance And Financial Audit Of The aha Moku Advisory Committee.