District Of Columbia 2025-2026 Regular Session

District Of Columbia Council Bill B260622

Introduced
3/2/26  

Caption

Consumer Levies on Obstructive Garbage Amendment Act of 2026

Summary

The Consumer Levies on Obstructive Garbage Amendment Act of 2026 would amend the District of Columbia sales tax code to impose a 15% tax on the sale of disposable wipes and other defined “nonwoven disposable products.” The bill defines those products broadly to include moist toilet tissue or cloth marketed or commonly used for personal hygiene, while excluding certain infant and young-child cleansing products that are not labeled as flushable. The stated purpose is to discourage flushing products that contribute to sewer blockages, fatbergs, and infrastructure damage. The bill also would exempt bidets from sales tax. In the bill text, a bidet is defined as a bathroom fixture attached to or separate from a standard toilet that uses a water stream for cleaning. The measure directs revenue from the new wipes tax to the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority’s capital improvements plan for sewer infrastructure projects, linking the tax policy directly to sewer maintenance and repair. In practical terms, the bill would change Title 47 of the D.C. Official Code by creating a new taxable category for nonwoven disposable products, setting the tax rate at 15%, and adding a corresponding sales tax exemption for bidets. It would also earmark the resulting revenue for DC Water sewer line improvements, making the measure both a tax policy and an infrastructure funding mechanism. The bill’s effective date would follow mayoral approval, any veto override, and congressional review. The general sentiment reflected in the introduction is strongly supportive and environmentally focused. The sponsor frames the measure as a response to sewer failures, wastewater overflows, and the harm caused by flushing wipes, emphasizing responsibility, public health, and protection of shared infrastructure. The tone is advocacy-oriented and somewhat humorous in its naming, but the policy rationale is serious and centered on reducing misuse of the sewer system. There is no recorded committee debate, vote history, or opposition in the provided materials, so no specific points of contention are documented. Based on the bill text itself, likely areas of debate would include whether a targeted sales tax is an effective behavior-change tool, whether the definition of taxable wipes is sufficiently clear, and whether taxing consumer hygiene products is equitable. However, those concerns are not explicitly raised in the available record.

Impact

The bill would amend D.C. sales tax law in Title 47 by creating a new 15% tax on sales of defined nonwoven disposable products, while exempting bidets from sales tax. It would also direct the tax proceeds to DC Water’s capital improvements plan for sewer infrastructure projects, thereby creating a dedicated funding stream for sewer maintenance and repair. The measure affects consumers who purchase disposable wipes, retailers that sell them, and DC Water as the recipient of earmarked revenue.

Sentiment

The available record shows a clearly supportive and policy-driven sentiment from the bill sponsor and co-introducers. The introduction presents the bill as a practical response to sewer damage caused by flushable wipes and as an incentive for more sustainable hygiene choices. No committee transcript, vote tally, or recorded opposition is provided, so the broader legislative sentiment cannot be measured beyond the bill’s enthusiastic framing.

Contention

No formal contention is documented in the provided materials because there are no committee transcripts or votes. Potential issues that could arise include the scope of the definition of “nonwoven disposable product,” whether the tax would be difficult to administer or enforce, whether it would disproportionately affect consumers, and whether exempting bidets is an appropriate use of tax policy to influence personal hygiene behavior. The bill’s earmarking of revenue for sewer infrastructure may also prompt questions about whether a product-specific tax is the best funding mechanism.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.