District Of Columbia 2025-2026 Regular Session

District Of Columbia Council Bill B260251

Introduced
5/19/25  
Engrossed
6/3/25  
Enrolled
6/24/25  
Passed
7/7/25  
Chaptered
8/23/25  
Passed
9/12/25  

Caption

Health Occupations Revision Exemption Temporary Amendment Act of 2025

Summary

The bill temporarily amends the District of Columbia Health Occupations Revision Act of 1985 to create a narrow licensure exemption for certain health professionals licensed, registered, or certified in good standing in another country. The exemption applies only when those professionals are accompanying a foreign athletic team competing in an organized sporting event in the District and are present to address the healthcare needs of that team. The exemption is limited in several ways. It may last no more than 30 consecutive days, and the covered care is restricted to athletes, support personnel, and coaching staff at the team’s basecamp, lodging, training sites, and competition venues in the District. The bill expressly does not authorize practice at a District healthcare clinic or facility, and it is temporary legislation that expires 225 days after taking effect.

Impact

This measure creates a temporary exception to the District’s general prohibition on practicing a health occupation without a District license, registration, or certification. It does not change the underlying licensure framework permanently, but it carves out a short-term, event-specific pathway for foreign medical personnel supporting visiting sports teams. The practical effect is to facilitate international sporting events in the District by allowing team doctors or other health professionals from abroad to provide limited on-site care without obtaining District licensure.

Sentiment

The available voting history suggests broad support and little controversy: the bill passed first reading and final reading unanimously, 12-0 on both occasions. No committee transcripts were provided, but the unanimous votes indicate the Council viewed the measure as a practical, limited administrative fix rather than a contentious policy change. The temporary and narrowly tailored nature of the exemption likely contributed to the positive reception.

Contention

No explicit opposition appears in the provided record. The main policy issue inherent in the bill is balancing public protection through licensure requirements against the operational needs of foreign sports teams participating in District events. Any concern would likely center on ensuring that only qualified professionals in good standing are covered, that the exemption remains limited to team-related care, and that it does not open the door to broader unlicensed practice in District facilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.