Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00036

Introduced
1/31/25  
Refer
1/31/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
3/28/25  

Caption

Resolution Proposing A State Constitutional Amendment Concerning Environmental Rights.

Summary

SJ00036 proposes a state constitutional amendment creating an explicit individual right to clean and healthy air, water, soil, ecosystems, and a clean and healthy environment, including a safe and stable climate. The amendment states that these rights are for the benefit of public health, safety, and the general welfare, and that the state may not unreasonably infringe on them. It also requires the state to make reasonable efforts to protect these rights equitably. The resolution further directs the state to conserve, manage, protect, and maintain Connecticut’s natural resources, including waters, air, flora, fauna, soils, and climate, for both present and future generations. It prohibits the state from unreasonably allowing environmental degradation, diminution, or depletion that causes significant or widespread environmental harm or results in an unhealthy or unsustainable environment. The proposed amendment says these environmental rights are equivalent to all other inalienable rights and may be directly invoked and enforced by state residents. If adopted, the measure would amend Article First of the Connecticut Constitution and could affect how state actions and policies are evaluated under constitutional law, especially in areas involving environmental regulation, permitting, land use, natural resource management, and climate-related decision-making. It would create a new constitutional standard that residents could use to challenge state conduct or inaction affecting environmental quality and climate stability. The general sentiment reflected in the available voting history appears favorable but not unanimous: the General Assembly committee reported the bill as a Joint Favorable Substitute by a 13-6 vote. No committee transcript is provided, so there is no recorded debate here, but the vote suggests meaningful support alongside some opposition or concern. The main point of contention is likely the scope and enforceability of the proposed constitutional right, especially the possibility of direct legal enforcement against the state and the breadth of obligations it would impose on government decision-making.

Impact

This resolution would amend the Connecticut Constitution by adding a new section to Article First establishing enforceable environmental rights. It would require the state to avoid unreasonable infringement on those rights and to take reasonable, equitable steps to protect them, while also imposing a constitutional duty to conserve and protect natural resources. If approved by voters, the amendment could influence state agencies, courts, and future legislation by creating a constitutional basis for environmental claims and challenges to state action or inaction.

Sentiment

The available record suggests generally positive committee support, with the bill receiving a 13-6 Joint Favorable Substitute vote in the General Assembly committee. Because no transcript excerpts are available, there is no detailed discussion to gauge arguments on either side, but the vote indicates the proposal had a clear majority while still drawing notable dissent. Overall, the sentiment appears supportive among proponents of environmental rights, with some legislators likely concerned about the amendment’s legal reach and policy implications.

Contention

The likely central point of contention is whether the Constitution should create a directly enforceable individual right to a clean and healthy environment and a safe and stable climate. Opponents may worry that the language is broad, could invite litigation, and might constrain future environmental, energy, land-use, or economic policy choices by the state. Supporters likely view the amendment as a necessary safeguard to ensure environmental protection and accountability, especially for present and future generations. The 13-6 committee vote shows that while the proposal had support, it was not unanimous and remained politically and legally contested.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.