Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01476

Introduced
3/6/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Report Pass
3/14/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Engrossed
4/30/25  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Able Act.

Summary

SB 1476 updates Connecticut’s ABLE program statutes to align them more closely with federal Section 529A of the Internal Revenue Code. The bill revises definitions throughout the ABLE account law, replacing older, more detailed statutory language with cross-references to federal law for terms such as eligible individual, designated beneficiary, and qualified disability expenses. It also modernizes account-opening rules by allowing an “authorized individual” to establish an account on behalf of a beneficiary when the beneficiary cannot do so, and it clarifies that the State Treasurer administers the Connecticut Achieving A Better Life Experience Trust as the state’s qualified ABLE program. The bill preserves and restates the Treasurer’s authority to manage, invest, and administer ABLE accounts, set participation agreement terms, contract for administrative services, assess fees, and ensure compliance so the program remains tax-advantaged under federal law. It also updates reporting requirements and confirms that ABLE funds are to be held in the trust rather than commingled with state funds. The bill further expands the state-law protections for ABLE savings by directing that ABLE assets, contributions, and qualified disability expense distributions be disregarded when determining eligibility for any state or locally administered means-tested public assistance program, and it excludes ABLE funds from consideration for need-based institutional aid at public higher education institutions. The bill’s impact on state law is primarily technical and conforming, but it has practical effects for people with disabilities and their families by making Connecticut’s ABLE rules more consistent with federal standards and by broadening the state-law disregard of ABLE assets in benefit eligibility determinations. It also updates the statutory framework governing the trust, account administration, and who may open or manage an account, which should make the program easier to administer and potentially easier for eligible individuals to use. The overall sentiment around the bill appears strongly favorable and noncontroversial. The available votes were unanimous in committee and on the Senate floor, with no recorded opposition, suggesting broad bipartisan support for the measure and for the ABLE program’s purpose of helping people with disabilities save for qualified expenses without losing eligibility for certain benefits. There is little evidence of substantive contention in the available materials. The only notable issues reflected in the bill text are drafting and conformity changes made by the Legislative Commissioners, such as updating references and clarifying the definition of “authorized individual.” Any policy implications appear to have been accepted broadly, with no recorded debate or dissent in the provided history.

Impact

The bill amends Connecticut’s ABLE account statutes to conform to federal Section 529A, updates account definitions and administration rules, and expands the state-law disregard of ABLE assets for means-tested public assistance and public higher-education aid. It primarily affects the State Treasurer, the Connecticut Achieving A Better Life Experience Trust, eligible individuals with disabilities, their families, and state agencies that determine benefit eligibility.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been received very positively and without opposition. It passed the Joint Favorable vote 22-0 and the Senate 35-0, indicating broad support for updating and strengthening the state’s ABLE program for people with disabilities and their families.

Contention

No substantive controversy is evident in the provided record. The only issues noted are technical drafting revisions by the Legislative Commissioners, including conforming statutory references and clarifying the term “authorized individual.” There is no recorded committee testimony or floor debate showing disagreement over the policy changes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.