Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01381

Introduced
2/25/25  
Refer
2/25/25  
Report Pass
3/18/25  
Refer
3/26/25  

Caption

An Act Concerning Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol Youth Camps.

Summary

SB 1381 makes a targeted change to Connecticut’s youth camp licensing laws by creating a specific exemption for the Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol when it operates youth camps on state-owned or state-leased property in a facility used exclusively by the Military Department. Under the bill, that organization may conduct such camps without obtaining a youth camp license from the Office of Early Childhood, so long as it meets the stated property and facility conditions and follows applicable regulations on diabetes glucose monitoring and the administration of medicinal preparations to children. The bill also largely preserves and restates the state’s broader youth camp safety framework. It continues to require licensing for youth camps generally, comprehensive background checks for employees with child-care duties or unsupervised access to children, periodic re-checks every five years, provisional work under supervision while checks are pending, record retention, and mandatory reporting of certain criminal convictions. It also preserves the commissioner’s authority to deny, suspend, or revoke licenses based on specified serious convictions or other disqualifying criminal history, and to impose civil penalties for failure to report convictions. In practical terms, the bill narrows state licensing requirements for one specific youth-camp operator while leaving the underlying child-safety screening and oversight rules in place for other camps. It affects the Office of Early Childhood, youth camp licensees, prospective and current camp employees, and the Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol. The bill also updates statutory cross-references and clarifies the language governing medication administration and diabetes-related care at camps. The overall sentiment appears strongly favorable and noncontroversial. The bill received a unanimous 29-0 Joint Favorable Substitute vote in committee, and there is no recorded transcript opposition in the materials provided. The absence of dissent suggests broad agreement that the measure is a narrow administrative accommodation rather than a major policy change. The main point of potential contention is the special treatment for the Civil Air Patrol, since it exempts one organization from a licensing requirement that applies to other youth camps. Even so, the bill appears to have been framed as a limited carveout tied to state property and military-facility use, which likely reduced concern. No other substantive disputes are reflected in the available record.

Impact

The bill amends Connecticut General Statutes section 19a-421 governing youth camp licensing by adding a narrow exemption for the Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol and by reaffirming existing licensing, background-check, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements for other youth camps. It leaves the Office of Early Childhood’s regulatory authority intact for the general youth-camp system while removing the need for a license in the specified Civil Air Patrol setting.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have been received positively and without controversy. The committee vote was unanimous, 29-0, and no opposing testimony or debate is included in the record provided. The measure reads as a limited, practical exemption rather than a broader rollback of child-safety protections, which likely contributed to the favorable reception.

Contention

The only notable tension is the creation of a single-organization exemption from youth camp licensing for the Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol, which could be viewed as preferential treatment compared with other camp operators. However, the exemption is tightly conditioned on the camp being held on state-owned or state-leased property in a facility used exclusively by the Military Department, and the bill preserves the applicable child-safety and medication-related rules. No other significant points of contention are evident in the available materials.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.