An Act Renaming A Bridge In The Town Of Brookfield In Honor Of Lance Corporal John T. Schmidt Iii.
Summary
HB 6714 is a narrow naming bill that amends an existing public act to change the official name of a bridge on Connecticut Route 133 in Brookfield. The bill would rename the structure from the “Lance Corporal John T. Schmidt Memorial Bridge” to the “Lance Corporal John T. Schmidt III Memorial Bridge,” adding the suffix “III” to reflect the full name of the honoree.
The measure does not create a new program, regulation, or funding obligation. Its sole legal effect is to update the statutory designation of a specific bridge in Brookfield so that state law matches the intended memorial name. The bill is primarily commemorative and local in scope, affecting transportation-related naming records and any signage or references tied to the bridge’s official designation.
Impact
If enacted, the bill would amend section 45 of public act 5-210 and change the official state-recognized name of the bridge on Route 133 in Brookfield. The practical impact would be limited to state transportation records, bridge signage, maps, and any legal references to the memorial bridge. No broader substantive changes to transportation policy, local governance, or state spending are indicated in the text.
Sentiment
The available record suggests the bill is noncontroversial and commemorative in nature. There are no committee transcripts, recorded votes, or other discussion snippets indicating opposition or debate. The naming change appears to be a straightforward correction or clarification honoring the intended individual, which typically draws neutral to supportive sentiment.
Contention
No notable points of contention are evident in the provided materials. Because there are no transcripts or votes, there is no record of disagreement over the bridge name, the honoree, or the statutory amendment. The only identifiable issue is the precision of the memorial designation—specifically, adding “III” to the honoree’s name—which appears to be the purpose of the bill rather than a source of dispute.