Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06591

Introduced
1/24/25  

Caption

An Act Requiring The Inclusion And Confirmation Of Certain Information In Medical Records.

Summary

HB06591 would amend Title 19a of the Connecticut General Statutes to require health care patient charts to contain specific identifying information: the patient’s photograph, date of birth, Social Security number, address, health insurer, and contact information. It would also require health care providers to confirm that the photograph and other chart information match the person presenting for treatment before billing the patient’s health insurer. The bill’s stated purpose is to prevent identity theft in health care settings. In practical terms, it would impose a new verification and documentation requirement on providers and would likely affect how patient intake, registration, and billing processes are handled across medical offices, clinics, and other health care facilities.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would create a new statutory requirement in Title 19a governing the contents of patient medical records and the identity-verification duties of health care providers. It would affect providers’ recordkeeping and billing practices, and it would require collection and maintenance of sensitive personal information, including photographs and Social Security numbers, in patient charts. The measure would also implicate patients, insurers, and health care administrators by adding a compliance step before insurance billing.

Sentiment

Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee debate or votes, the available sentiment is limited to the bill’s protective framing. The proposal is presented as an anti-fraud and anti-identity-theft measure, suggesting a consumer-protection rationale rather than a punitive one. No formal support or opposition is documented in the provided materials.

Contention

The main likely point of contention is the balance between fraud prevention and privacy. Supporters would likely emphasize identity-theft prevention and billing integrity, while opponents may object to requiring storage of highly sensitive data such as Social Security numbers and photographs in medical records. Providers could also raise operational concerns about workflow burden, data security, and the feasibility of reliably matching records to patients before billing insurers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.