Connecticut 2025 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06565

Introduced
1/24/25  

Caption

An Act Requiring Certain Health Care Providers To Communicate Any Safety Plan Prescribed To A Minor Patient Upon Discharge With Such Minor Patient's School.

Summary

HB06565 would require hospitals and emergency psychiatric health care providers to share a safety plan with a minor patient’s school when that plan is prescribed at discharge, but only with the consent of the minor’s parent or legal guardian. The bill is aimed at situations where a child receives emergency mental health care and leaves the facility with a plan intended to reduce risk and support follow-up care. The measure is narrowly focused on communication between health care providers and schools for minors. It does not create a new treatment standard or require schools to develop safety plans; instead, it creates a disclosure and coordination requirement so that schools can be informed of a student’s post-discharge safety needs when parental consent is given.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would amend the general statutes to impose a new duty on hospitals and emergency psychiatric providers to communicate discharge safety plans for minor patients to schools, subject to parental or guardian consent. It would affect health care providers, parents or legal guardians, and school personnel involved in student support and safety planning, and would likely require procedures for consent, information sharing, and confidentiality compliance.

Sentiment

No committee transcript or vote record is available, so there is no direct evidence of support or opposition in the provided materials. Based on the bill text and statement of purpose, the proposal appears to be framed as a student safety and mental health coordination measure, suggesting a protective and preventive policy rationale rather than a controversial substantive change.

Contention

The main potential point of contention is the balance between student safety and privacy/confidentiality in mental health care. Supporters would likely emphasize improved school awareness and crisis prevention, while critics may focus on the burden on providers, the logistics of obtaining and documenting consent, and concerns about sharing sensitive psychiatric information with schools. The bill’s requirement that disclosure occur only with parent or guardian consent may also be seen as a safeguard, but it could limit implementation in cases where consent is not granted.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.