An Act Prohibiting Students Who Are Biological Males From Competing On Female-only Athletic Teams And Using Female-only Locker Rooms And Facilities.
Summary
HB 6453 would amend Title 10 of the Connecticut General Statutes to bar students identified in the bill as “biological males” from participating on public female-only high school athletic teams in both interscholastic and intramural sports. It also would prohibit those students from using female-only locker rooms and facilities. The bill’s stated purpose is to prevent biological males from participating in girls’ sports and accessing girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms.
In practical terms, the bill would create a categorical sex-based restriction for public school athletics and certain school facilities, affecting students, school districts, athletic programs, and administrators responsible for enforcing team eligibility and facility access rules. Because the bill is framed as an amendment to Title 10, it would alter state education law governing student participation in school sports and use of sex-separated school spaces.
Impact
The bill would change Connecticut education law by adding a prohibition on participation by biological males in female-only athletic teams and on access to female-only locker rooms and facilities in public high schools. It would likely require school districts and athletic associations to adopt or revise eligibility, privacy, and facility-use policies, and could affect enforcement practices in interscholastic and intramural athletics. The measure would also potentially intersect with existing state and federal nondiscrimination, privacy, and student rights policies.
Sentiment
No committee transcripts or recorded votes were provided, so there is no direct evidence of legislative debate or vote outcomes for this bill. Based on the bill text and statement of purpose, the proposal appears to be strongly supportive of sex-segregated sports and facilities and reflects a policy position commonly associated with restricting transgender girls’ participation in girls’ athletics. The absence of recorded discussion prevents a reliable assessment of broader legislative sentiment beyond the bill’s sponsor-driven framing.
Contention
The central point of contention is the bill’s exclusion of students it defines as biological males from girls’ sports and female-only facilities. Supporters would likely argue the measure protects fairness in athletics, privacy, and safety in locker rooms and bathrooms, while opponents would likely view it as discriminatory toward transgender students and inconsistent with inclusive school policies. Because no hearing transcript or vote record is available, the specific lawmakers, advocacy groups, or school stakeholders raising these concerns cannot be identified from the provided materials.