Concerning the appointment of a joint committee to notify the Governor that the Second Regular Session of the Seventy-fifth General Assembly is about to adjourn sine die.
House Joint Resolution 26-1032 is a procedural resolution used at the end of a legislative session. It authorizes the appointment of a five-member joint committee, made up of three House members and two Senate members, to formally notify Governor Jared Polis that the Second Regular Session of the Seventy-fifth General Assembly is about to adjourn sine die. The committee is also directed to ask whether the Governor has any communication to deliver to the General Assembly in joint session.
The resolution does not create, amend, or repeal any substantive law. Its effect is limited to the internal operations and ceremonial procedures of the Colorado General Assembly, specifically the adjournment process and the customary exchange of messages between the legislature and the governor at the close of session. Because it is a joint resolution, it functions as a legislative action rather than a statute and has no direct regulatory or fiscal impact on the public.
HJR26-1032 affects legislative procedure only. It establishes a temporary joint committee for the purpose of notifying the Governor of adjournment and inquiring about any final communication to the legislature, but it does not change Colorado statutes, agency authority, or rights and obligations of any person or entity. Its impact is limited to the orderly conclusion of the legislative session and the formal record of adjournment.
The bill appears to have been routine and noncontroversial. As a standard end-of-session resolution, it likely received little substantive debate because it concerns ceremonial and procedural business rather than policy. The available voting history and committee materials do not show any recorded opposition or discussion of policy differences.
There are no notable points of contention in the available record. The resolution is administrative in nature, and no legislators, committees, or outside parties are identified as opposing it. Any action on the measure appears to have been driven by customary legislative procedure rather than disagreement over its content.