Colorado 2026 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB261339

Caption

Concerning a change in the name of the voluntary legal holiday observed on March 31 from "Cesar Chavez Day" to "Farm Workers Day".

Summary

HB26-1339 changes the name of Colorado’s voluntary legal holiday observed on March 31 from “Cesar Chavez Day” to “Farm Workers Day.” The bill keeps the date and basic structure of the observance in place, but revises the statutory name in Colorado law and in the holiday’s public-school and public-agency observance provisions. It also updates the related legislative declaration to explain the policy rationale for the rename. The bill’s declaration emphasizes the history and contributions of farm workers and the broader farm worker movement, including labor protections, workplace safety gains, and union organizing. It states that the General Assembly is renaming the holiday to honor farm workers generally and to recognize the contributions of Dolores Huerta and others, rather than continuing to celebrate a holiday bearing Cesar Chavez’s name. The bill does not create a new paid holiday or change the date; it rebrands an existing voluntary observance. In practical terms, the bill amends Colorado Revised Statutes section 24-11-112 to replace references to “Cesar Chavez Day” with “Farm Workers Day.” State agencies may still allow employees to take the day off with pay in lieu of another qualifying legal holiday, and agencies must remain open at a minimum operational level on that day. Public observance in schools and by the public remains authorized, but under the new name. The overall sentiment reflected in the bill text is supportive of farm worker recognition and critical of Cesar Chavez as a namesake, based on the legislative declaration’s reference to allegations of sexual abuse. The bill’s sponsors are broad and bipartisan in the House, suggesting substantial support for the rename, though the provided materials do not include recorded committee testimony or vote counts. Because the bill is framed as a symbolic rename rather than a substantive labor-policy change, the main point of contention is likely the decision to remove Cesar Chavez’s name and the political and cultural implications of that change. Notable contention centers on whether Colorado should continue honoring Cesar Chavez or instead shift the holiday to a more general tribute to farm workers and labor activism. Supporters appear to view the rename as a way to recognize the broader movement and avoid honoring an individual associated in the declaration with serious misconduct allegations. Opponents, if any, would likely argue that the change diminishes Chavez’s historical role in labor rights and Latino history, but no formal opposition is included in the provided record.

Impact

The bill amends C.R.S. 24-11-112 to rename the March 31 voluntary legal holiday from “Cesar Chavez Day” to “Farm Workers Day,” while leaving the date, observance framework, and state-agency leave provisions intact. It affects state agencies, public schools, and the statutory holiday calendar, but does not create a new holiday or alter employee leave rights beyond the name change.

Sentiment

The bill’s tone and legislative declaration are strongly supportive of honoring farm workers and of replacing Cesar Chavez’s name on the holiday. The available sponsorship list suggests broad support, and there is no recorded committee or floor opposition in the provided materials. Overall, the sentiment appears favorable to the rename, with the bill presented as a symbolic recognition of farm worker contributions and a rejection of continued commemoration of Chavez.

Contention

The main point of contention is the decision to remove Cesar Chavez’s name from the holiday and replace it with a broader farm-worker designation. Supporters emphasize honoring farm workers collectively and cite allegations of sexual abuse by Chavez as a reason not to continue the existing name. Potential critics would likely focus on Chavez’s legacy as a labor and civil-rights figure and argue that the rename erases an important historical symbol, but no direct opposition is documented in the provided transcripts or votes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.