Concerning correcting cross references in the child support guidelines.
Summary
HB26-1217 is a technical correction bill that updates cross-references within Colorado’s child support guidelines in section 14-10-115 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. The bill does not create a new child support policy or change the underlying formula; instead, it aligns several statutory references so the child support worksheet and related calculations point to the correct subsections after prior or concurrent revisions to the law.
The bill amends language governing how basic child support obligations are calculated, including references tied to low-income adjustments, shared overnight parenting time, and the treatment of additional costs such as child care, health insurance, and extraordinary medical expenses. It also updates references to extraordinary adjustments and direct payments made on behalf of children, ensuring the statute remains internally consistent and usable by courts, practitioners, and child support administrators.
Impact
The bill’s impact is limited to statutory maintenance rather than substantive policy change. It revises Colorado Revised Statutes section 14-10-115 to correct internal citations in the child support guidelines, which helps preserve the accuracy and enforceability of the child support calculation framework used in family law cases. The affected parties are parents subject to child support orders, family court judges, attorneys, and state agencies that rely on the guidelines to calculate support obligations.
Sentiment
The available context suggests the bill was noncontroversial and routine. There are no recorded committee transcripts or votes indicating opposition, and the measure advanced through the process and was signed by the Governor. Bills of this type are typically viewed favorably because they clean up drafting errors and reduce the risk of confusion in applying the law.
Contention
There is no notable substantive contention reflected in the available record. Because the bill is a technical correction measure, any discussion would likely have centered on ensuring the cross-references were accurate rather than debating child support policy. No specific stakeholders or opposing viewpoints are identified in the provided materials.