Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1155

Report Pass
2/10/25  
Introduced
1/29/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Refer
1/29/25  
Introduced
2/11/25  
Report Pass
2/10/25  
Refer
2/11/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Engrossed
2/19/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Report Pass
3/6/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Engrossed
3/19/25  
Engrossed
3/20/25  
Enrolled
3/20/25  

Caption

Modify Candidate Authority Watchers General Election

Summary

House Bill 25-1155 narrows and clarifies who may select election watchers in certain recount settings. Under current law, watchers are generally chosen by party officials, party candidates, unaffiliated candidates, or designated proponents/opponents for ballot measures. This bill expands that authority so that a candidate on the ballot for U.S. Senate, U.S. House, state office, district office of state concern, or county office who is subject to a recount may also select an eligible elector to serve as a watcher. The bill also directs the Secretary of State’s recount rules, and county clerks’ recount procedures, to ensure that a candidate subject to a recount may choose one additional watcher for the recount beyond any watchers otherwise allowed. The change applies to recounts for congressional, state, district, and certain county offices, as well as related recounts conducted by county clerks in coordinated elections. The bill takes effect after the standard post-session period unless referred to the voters, and it applies only to recounts held on or after the effective date.

Impact

HB1155 amends Colorado election law in sections defining "watcher" and governing recount procedures, specifically Colorado Revised Statutes sections 1-1-104, 1-10.5-102, and 1-10.5-103. Its practical effect is to give candidates facing a recount a direct role in selecting at least one watcher, increasing candidate participation in recount oversight and adding an explicit procedural requirement for county clerks and the Secretary of State when administering recounts.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have broad bipartisan support and little visible opposition. It passed the House and Senate with unanimous votes in the recorded actions, and the Senate State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Committee recommended it for the consent calendar. The absence of recorded dissent suggests the measure was viewed as a straightforward election-administration adjustment rather than a controversial policy change.

Contention

No major points of contention are reflected in the available record. The main policy question is whether candidates themselves should have the right to designate a watcher during a recount, in addition to watchers selected through existing party or other channels. Any concern would likely center on recount administration, neutrality, or the number of watchers allowed, but the bill’s unanimous votes indicate those issues did not generate significant disagreement in committee or on the floor.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.