Colorado 2023 Regular Session

Colorado Senate Bill SB102

Introduced
1/31/23  
Refer
1/31/23  
Report Pass
2/23/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Engrossed
3/2/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Enrolled
4/27/23  
Engrossed
5/3/23  
Engrossed
5/4/23  
Enrolled
5/4/23  

Caption

Rule Review Bill

Impact

The enactment of SB102 will have significant implications for the regulation of various sectors by extending the rules that govern licensure and registration in multiple professions. As such, professionals within these fields will not face immediate changes in regulatory requirements, aiding in a smoother operational environment while comprehensive evaluations are conducted. This postponement is expected to maintain the status quo of regulatory oversight until a thorough assessment is completed, which benefits both the state and those who rely on these regulations for their professional practice.

Summary

Senate Bill 102 aims to implement the recommendations of the Committee on Legal Services regarding the legislative review of state agencies’ rules. Specifically, the bill postpones the expiration of certain rules that were adopted or amended between November 1, 2021, and November 1, 2022, in various state departments. This includes important agencies such as the Departments of Health, Education, and Corrections. The intent behind this bill is to ensure that these rules remain effective while they undergo further review and assessment, providing stability in regulatory practices.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment toward SB102 appears supportive among those who prioritize consistency in regulatory practices. Stakeholders, including various professional organizations, likely view this bill positively as it safeguards their existing licenses and certifications against abrupt changes. However, some dissent may arise from those who argue that the prolonged delay in reviewing these regulations could inhibit necessary reforms and updates that might improve occupational standards and public safety.

Contention

Notable points of contention stem from the debate over the need for timely reviews of rules against the need for regulatory stability. Advocates for expedited reviews might argue that the postponement can delay important improvements in professional standards and public protections. Conversely, those in favor of the bill contend that it is essential to ensure that all stakeholders are adequately prepared for any future changes that may arise from the proceedings of the Committee on Legal Services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2141

Pharmacies: license discipline: stipulated settlement and disciplinary order.

MI HB4926

Health: licensing; procedure for vacating disciplinary records of certain licensees or registrants; provide for. Amends secs. 16211, 16216 & 16238 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16211 et seq.) & adds sec. 16211a.

MD SB83

Health Occupations - Grounds for Discipline - Federal and Court Actions

MI HB5284

Occupations: individual licensing and registration; procedure for vacating disciplinary records of certain licensees or registrants; provide for. Amends secs. 729, 2009 & 2627 of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.729 et seq.) & adds sec. 2504b.

MI SB0684

Health: licensing; procedure for vacating disciplinary records of certain licensees or registrants; provide for. Amends secs. 16211, 16216, 16238 & 16315 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16211 et seq.) & adds sec. 16211a.

TX HB881

Relating to a progressive disciplinary matrix for police officer misconduct in certain municipalities.

NJ A1114

Establishes position of Ombudsman of Student Discipline to serve within Office of Secretary of Higher Education.

NH SB470

relative to the expungement of certain disciplinary matters.