Colorado 2022 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1297

Introduced
3/11/22  
Refer
3/11/22  
Report Pass
3/28/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Engrossed
4/4/22  
Refer
4/4/22  
Report Pass
4/12/22  
Refer
4/12/22  
Engrossed
5/23/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Enrolled
5/25/22  

Caption

Daylight Saving Time Year Round

Impact

If enacted, the bill would revise Colorado's timekeeping statutes to shift permanently to daylight saving time. This would eliminate the need for clock adjustments twice a year, potentially mitigating health risks linked to time changes, such as sleep disturbances and increased incidents of heart attacks and traffic accidents. The bill's proponents argue that these changes would enhance public safety, workplace productivity, and overall quality of life for Coloradans. However, the implementation of this bill is dependent on similar legislation passing in neighboring states and the establishment of federal allowances.

Summary

House Bill 1297 proposes the establishment of daylight saving time as the standard time for Colorado throughout the year, contingent on federal law changes that would allow such a shift. The bill outlines legislative findings acknowledging the drawbacks of the current system, citing negative impacts on health, business productivity, and individuals' well-being stemming from the biannual clock changes mandated by the Uniform Time Act of 1966. Lawmakers assert that maintaining a consistent time year-round would align better with the needs of residents and the economy, reducing disruptions caused by time changes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1297 has been largely positive among its supporters, who emphasize the health benefits and economic rationale behind the proposal. Advocates argue that the current practice of changing clocks creates unnecessary stress and health risks, advocating for a permanent transition to daylight saving time. Opponents, while less vocal, raise concerns regarding the traditional view of timekeeping and potential challenges in coordinating with states that do not adopt similar measures.

Contention

Notably, the debate has not been without contention. While support for the bill aligns with a broader push for more flexible time policies, critics question the readiness of federal law to accommodate such changes, as well as the implications for states that choose to maintain standard time. Moreover, the necessity for at least four other states in the Mountain Time zone to enact similar legislation adds another layer of complexity, potentially delaying or complicating the law's enactment and effectiveness.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1197

Permanent standard time.

CA SB51

Permanent standard time.

NJ S3236

Establishes permanent daylight saving time in NJ.

NJ A1703

Establishes permanent daylight saving time in NJ.

NJ S293

Establishes permanent standard time in NJ.

KS HB2594

Modifying the elements of the crime of blackmail related to threatened dissemination of any image, video or other recording of another identifiable person who is nude or engaged in sexual activity by changing the connection to breach of privacy and describing the content of the image, video or other recording.

KS SB1

Exempting the state of Kansas from daylight saving time but providing for moving to permanent daylight saving time upon an act of Congress requiring such move.

TX SB64

Relating to observing standard time year-round and authorizing a statewide referendum allowing voters to indicate a preference for observing standard time year-round or observing daylight saving time year-round.