California Senate Bill SB99

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/25
• Refer: 2/5/25
• Refer: 4/1/25
• Report Pass: 4/22/25
• Refer: 4/23/25
• Report Pass: 4/29/25
• Refer: 4/29/25
• Refer: 1/5/26
• Report Pass: 1/13/26
• Refer: 1/13/26
• Report Pass: 1/14/26
• Refer: 1/15/26
• Report Pass: 1/22/26
• Engrossed: 1/27/26
• Refer: 5/4/26

Caption

An act to amend Section 6383 of, and to add Section 6310 to, the Family Code, relating to protective orders.

Impact

The implications of SB 99 extend to existing state laws governing domestic violence and protective orders. By integrating military protective orders into the purview of domestic relations law, the bill will create a more comprehensive legal framework that recognizes the unique circumstances surrounding military personnel involved in domestic violence cases. Local law enforcement agencies will be required to adopt memoranda of understanding with military law enforcement bodies, thereby increasing collaboration between civilian and military jurisdictions to enforce protective orders effectively. The bill also includes mandatory reimbursements for local agencies incurred due to these changes, as determined by the Commission on State Mandates.

Summary

Senate Bill 99, introduced by Senator Blakespear, seeks to amend the California Family Code regarding protective orders in domestic violence cases. The bill aims to enhance protective measures by allowing courts to consider any existing military protective orders when determining whether to issue a domestic violence restraining order. This addition is particularly relevant for incidents involving service members, as it addresses the complexities that may arise when military and civilian protective orders intersect. Furthermore, law enforcement agencies will be required to verify such military orders at the scene of domestic violence incidents, ensuring that existing commands from military authorities are duly considered.

Sentiment

The response to SB 99 has been predominantly positive, particularly among advocates who focus on protecting victims of domestic violence, including military spouses. Supporters see this bill as a significant step toward improving the responsiveness of the legal system to the complexities faced by service members. However, there are concerns regarding the additional responsibilities placed on local law enforcement and the potential for operational challenges, especially in areas with significant military populations, which could strain existing resources.

Contention

Despite its generally positive reception, SB 99 has sparked discussions about the balance of power between civilian and military jurisdictions in domestic violence cases. Critics worry that the emphasis on military protective orders may overshadow civilian needs and complicate the enforcement of local protective measures. Some lawmakers have raised concerns about the adequacy of training and resources available to law enforcement to handle these new responsibilities effectively. Overall, while SB 99 aims to enhance protection for victims of domestic violence, the execution of its provisions remains a point of significant dialogue among stakeholders.