California Senate Bill SB972

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/4/26
• Refer: 2/11/26
• Report Pass: 3/18/26
• Refer: 3/18/26
• Report Pass: 4/8/26
• Refer: 4/8/26

Caption

An act to amend Section 22002 of, and to add Section 22100.3 to, the Financial Code, relating to financial institutions.

Impact

SB 972 modifies existing financial laws by recognizing SEC-registered investment advisers as eligible licensees under the California Financing Law, thereby broadening the definition of who can engage in commercial lending. The bill mandates that these advisers can only engage in lending activities limited to commercial loans exceeding $500,000, which precludes smaller loan types such as consumer loans and mortgage origination. The legislation also stipulates that investment advisers must meet various conditions for licensure, including maintaining a surety bond and adhering to background check requirements, thus creating a more structured compliance environment.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 972, introduced by Senator Grayson, aims to amend the California Financing Law by authorizing SEC-registered investment advisers to apply for and obtain a finance lender license to conduct lending activities on their own behalf and on behalf of client accounts. This bill is significant as it expands the regulatory framework for financial institutions, particularly for advisers involved in commercial loans. By allowing investment advisers to act directly as finance lenders, the bill aims to facilitate business operations in the commercial financing sector and streamline the licensing process under California state law.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB 972 is its expansion of the definition of exempt persons under the California Financing Law, which raises questions about regulatory oversight and consumer protection. Opponents might argue that allowing investment advisers to enter the commercial lending space could lead to conflicts of interest or less stringent oversight compared to traditional lenders. Supporters, however, assert that this change will foster economic growth by increasing access to commercial financing while maintaining essential regulatory checks.