California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB953

Introduced
 
Introduced
2/2/26  
Refer
2/11/26  
Refer
4/6/26  
Report Pass
4/15/26  
Refer
4/15/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  
Engrossed
5/22/26  
Refer
6/1/26  
Report Pass
6/9/26  

Caption

An act to amend Section 12810 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.

Impact

The proposed changes in SB 953 create a notable shift in how penalties are administered for vehicular manslaughter violations within California law. Specifically, the imposition of points on a driver's record, even for cases that don’t lead to convictions due to successful completion of diversion units, consolidates stricter consequences for such actions. This could lead to increased insurance rates or further driving privileges being impacted, underscoring a more punitive approach to driving incidents regarded as manslaughter.

Summary

Senate Bill 953 seeks to amend Section 12810 of the Vehicle Code, specifically addressing the point system associated with violations of vehicular manslaughter. Under existing law, vehicular manslaughter, whether caused by gross negligence or not, is met with serious penalties. This bill proposes to assign 2 violation points to a driver's record even if a misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter violation is dismissed after a judge has offered a diversion program, thereby impacting how points are counted on a driving record post-diversion.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 953 may be mixed. Proponents argue that retaining a strict point count for vehicular manslaughter violations, even when dismissed, serves as a necessary deterrent against negligent behavior behind the wheel. Meanwhile, critics may voice concern regarding fairness, questioning if this bill places excessive burdens on individuals who are showing signs of rehabilitation through diversion programs. The nuances of accountability and rehabilitation are likely to fuel ongoing discussions among legislators.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 953 revolve around the fairness of assigning points for dismissed cases, as this may undermine the intent of diversion programs designed to prevent future offenses. Some may argue that individuals who have demonstrated compliance with court-mandated conditions should not be subject to punitive measures that could affect their ability to drive. The potential for such regulatory changes might spark debates on the broader implications for public safety and justice within the state's legal framework.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB390

An act to amend Section 21809 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.

CA HB533

Revise list of vehicles that can commit vehicular homicide

CA AB1685

Driving privilege: points.

CA AB545

An act to amend Section 24016 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.

CA HB132

Enact Philip Wigal's Law

CA AB1546

Vehicles: driving under the influence.

CA AB1272

An act to amend Section 25 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.

CA AB1747

Crimes involving vehicles.

CA SB383

Driver’s licenses and identification cards.

CA AB544

An act to amend Sections 21201 and 21212 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.

Similar Bills

CA AB2570

Elderly Parole Program.

MN SF1826

Payment rates establishment for certain substance use disorder treatment services

MN HF1994

Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.

TX HB1080

Relating to the publication of required notice by a political subdivision by alternative media.

CA SB680

Sex offender registration: unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.

CA AB387

An act to amend Section 219 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to juries.

CA SB689

Local jurisdictions: district-based elections.

US HB31

Cover Outstanding Vulnerable Expansion-eligible Residents Now Act or the COVER Now Act This bill establishes a demonstration program to allow local governments to provide health benefits to the Medicaid expansion population in states that have not expanded Medicaid. Under the program, local governments may provide coverage for individuals who are newly eligible for Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (i.e., the Medicaid expansion population) for a maximum of 10 years, or until their respective states expand Medicaid. The bill provides a 100% federal matching rate for the first three years of program participation. The bill prohibits states from taking certain actions against participating localities, such as withholding funding, increasing taxes, or restricting provider participation. States that violate these requirements are subject to certain funding penalties.