California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB760

Introduced
 
Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  
Engrossed
5/27/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  
Engrossed
5/27/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  
Enrolled
9/13/25  
Chaptered
10/10/25  
Enrolled
9/13/25  
Passed
10/10/25  

Caption

An act to amend Section 84224 of the Government Code, relating to the Political Reform Act of 1974.

Impact

If passed, SB760 would change the landscape of campaign finance reporting by reducing obligations for officials making public appeals. This could potentially lead to a decrease in transparency for large donations given in response to public solicitations. Considering that behested payments often have implications on ethical governance, the impact of this exemption could result in less public scrutiny over contributions made in response to such appeals.

Summary

Senate Bill 760, introduced by Allen, aims to amend Section 84224 of the Government Code concerning the Political Reform Act of 1974, which regulates campaign financing and sets reporting requirements for behested payments. Under current law, elected officials and members of the Public Utilities Commission must report behested payments exceeding $5,000 within 30 days. However, SB760 proposes to exempt these officials from reporting if they make a public appeal for payment, provided they or their immediate associates do not have a role in the payee organization.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB760 is mixed. Supporters argue that the bill simplifies the process for elected officials, allowing them to mobilize funds for charitable and legislative purposes without bureaucratic obstacles. However, detractors express concerns that the exemption could foster undue influence and lead to a lack of accountability. Critics warn that it might undermine the principles of transparency that are vital for public trust in governmental operations.

Contention

Notably, the bill incorporates additional changes proposed by Assembly Bill 808, and its provisions would only become operable under specific conditions related to the enactment of that bill. Therefore, a significant point of contention is how both pieces of legislation interact and whether their combined effects might further complicate transparency regulations or dilute existing accountability measures inherent in the Political Reform Act of 1974.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB775

An act to amend Section 84224 of, and to add Sections 84224.

CA AB1029

An act to amend, repeal, and add Section 82034, 87206, 87302, and 87350 of the Government Code, relating to the Political Reform Act of 1974.

CA AB2421

An act to amend Section 82013 of, and to add Section 84214.5 to, the Government Code, relating to the Political Reform Act of 1974.

CA SB1432

An act to amend Sections 83109, 85200, 86112.3, and 86116 and 86112.3 of the Government Code, relating to the Political Reform Act of 1974.

CA SB1389

The Political Reform Act of 1974: late filing of reports.

CA AB1788

Political Reform Act of 1974: travel expenditures.

CA AB789

Political Reform Act of 1974: security expenses.

CA AB1789

Political Reform Act of 1974: candidate trainings.

CA SB817

Political Reform Act of 1974.

CA SB852

Political Reform Act of 1974: Citizens Redistricting Commission.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.