California Senate Bill SB1423

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/26
• Refer: 3/4/26
• Refer: 3/25/26
• Refer: 3/26/26
• Refer: 4/8/26
• Report Pass: 4/22/26
• Refer: 4/23/26
• Report Pass: 5/14/26
• Engrossed: 5/27/26
• Refer: 6/4/26
• Refer: 6/10/26

Caption

An act to add Section 65040.18 to, and to add Article 15 (commencing with Section 65770) to Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of, the Government Code, relating to land use.

Impact

The bill's enactment is expected to significantly reshape how state and federal transportation funds are allocated, promoting pedestrian-centric planning. By transitioning from the Active Transportation Program to the Safe Streets Program, the bill aligns funding with modern priorities aimed at improving pedestrian experiences and safety. Subsequently, communities will see a more focused approach towards ensuring that their streets are safe and accessible, addressing a critical component of urban planning that is often overlooked in traditional transportation funding schemes.

Summary

Senate Bill 1423, introduced by Senator Stern, aims to reform transportation funding in California by amending provisions related to the State Transportation Improvement Program and the Active Transportation Program. This bill emphasizes the importance of safe streets by mandating that at least 50% of funds from both the interregional transportation improvement program and regional transportation improvement program be dedicated to safe streets projects. These projects are particularly prioritized in transit-oriented development zones that currently lack adequate pedestrian safety and mobility access, ensuring that investments are directed towards areas in need of improvement.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 1423 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates of pedestrian safety and sustainable urban development. The emphasis on safe streets and equitable access aligns with broader legislative goals of enhancing community health and promoting active transportation modes, such as walking and cycling. However, some stakeholders may express concern over the allocation processes and the potential administrative burdens introduced by the new application guidelines for funding.

Contention

Notably, while there is enthusiasm for the bill's intent, discussion may arise regarding the requirement for establishing a two-phase application process and a preapplication screening process. Critics could argue that such requirements may complicate access to funding for smaller communities or organizations lacking the resources for detailed planning. Furthermore, the bill will automatically repeal these provisions on January 1, 2032, which may generate debate on the long-term sustainability of the funding framework and its efficacy in addressing ongoing transportation issues.