California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1374

Introduced
 
Introduced
2/20/26  
Refer
3/4/26  
Report Pass
3/24/26  
Refer
3/24/26  
Refer
4/13/26  
Report Pass
3/24/26  
Report Pass
4/22/26  
Refer
3/24/26  
Refer
4/22/26  
Refer
4/13/26  
Report Pass
4/22/26  

Caption

An act to amend Section 527.85 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to civil actions.

Impact

If enacted, SB 1374 would empower educational administrators to act swiftly in securing protection for students experiencing threats, potentially altering how safety and order are maintained within academic environments. This could increase accountability among institutions for student safety and may lead to a more structured response to any violence or threats, thus promoting a safer educational atmosphere.

Summary

Senate Bill 1374, introduced by Senator Niello and co-authored by Senator Ochoa Bogh, seeks to extend the authority of chief administrative officers at postsecondary educational institutions to seek temporary restraining orders (TROs) on behalf of students who face unlawful violence or credible threats of violence. The bill amends Section 527.85 of the Code of Civil Procedure, emphasizing the need for such measures to maintain safety on campuses and protect both students and institutional property.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1374 appears to be generally positive, particularly among advocates of student safety and mental health. Supporters argue that enhancing the capabilities of school officials to address volatility preemptively could foster a safer learning environment. However, some critics may raise concerns about potential overreach or misuse of such authority if not carefully monitored, indicating a need for guidelines to prevent abuse of these powers.

Contention

Despite the overall support, there are notable points of contention regarding the implementation of the bill. Critics argue that broadening the definitions for what constitutes a credible threat and permissible actions for obtaining a restraining order may inadvertently lead to conflicts concerning freedom of speech and due process. Additionally, questions surrounding the training and discretion of school officials in determining the validity of threats are points of active debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB824

An act to amend Sections 527.

CA AB2042

An act to amend Section 1788.61 of the Civil Code, and to amend Sections 417.10 and 473.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to civil actions.

CA SB436

An act to amend Sections 791 and 1942.

CA AB540

An act to amend Sections 437c, 1005, and 1010.

CA SB29

An act to amend Section 377.

CA AB250

Sexual assault: statute of limitations.

CA SB85

Civil actions: service of summons.

CA AB1162

An act to amend Section 529.

CA AB1384

Summary proceedings for obtaining possession of real property: procedural requirements.

CA SB916

An act to amend Section 529.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to civil actions.

Similar Bills

MS SB2219

Rejecting Racism in Higher Education Act; enact.

NV AB164

Revises provisions relating to the Account for Student Indemnification. (BDR 34-544)

CA AB2392

Public postsecondary education: generative artificial intelligence systems: procurement standards: training.

CA AB58

University of California, Merced: medical school.

SC H3219

Rejecting Racism in Postsecondary Education Act

MS HB344

Public universities and colleges; require to have epinephrine auto-injectors and AEDs in every building on campus.

CA AB805

Career Apprenticeship Bridge Program.

CA AB587

Student Aid Commission: membership.