California Senate Bill SB1369

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/2/26
• Introduced: 2/20/26
• Refer: 3/4/26
• Refer: 3/26/26
• Report Pass: 4/7/26
• Refer: 4/7/26
• Engrossed: 5/19/26
• Refer: 5/26/26

Caption

An act to amend Sections 101 and 11220 of the Elections Code, relating to elections.

Impact

The implications of SB 1369 are significant, particularly as it reshapes the process of initiating recall elections. By requiring proponents to affirm the truthfulness of their statements, the legislation adds a layer of accountability. The enforcement of such penalties could influence the willingness of individuals to engage in recall efforts, potentially deterring frivolous or unjustified recalls. Furthermore, the specific time limits set for submitting recall petitions based on the size of the electoral jurisdiction indicate an effort to streamline the process, which may impact how rapidly concerns can be addressed through elections.

Summary

Senate Bill 1369, introduced by Senator Reyes, aims to amend various sections of the Elections Code regarding recall petitions. The bill introduces new requirements for paid signature gatherers, mandating them to disclose their paid status orally to individuals before they sign the petitions. This addition emphasizes voter awareness about the motivations behind petition signing, underlining the need for transparency in the electoral process. The bill also specifies that proponents of a recall must sign a statement of reasons for the proposed recall under penalty of perjury, effectively establishing a new crime if this requirement is violated.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1369 appears to be mixed, reflecting the broader tensions inherent in electoral reforms. Proponents laud the efforts to ensure integrity and transparency, positioning the bill as an important step in enhancing trust in the electoral process. Conversely, critics argue that such regulations could inadvertently suppress grassroots movements by making the process of initiating a recall more daunting. This division highlights ongoing debates about the balance between maintaining electoral integrity and allowing robust political participation at the local level.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 1369 include the potentially chilling effect on citizen-led recalls, especially in smaller jurisdictions where fewer registered voters may make such initiatives harder to mobilize. Additionally, debates may arise around the fairness of requiring paid gatherers to disclose their status, with concerns about how such requirements might affect the dynamic of grassroots organizing. The bill's provision that no state reimbursement is required for any costs incurred from these new mandates has also been a source of concern, indicating potential financial burdens on local governments without state support.