An act to add Section 9025.5 to the Government Code, relating to the Legislature.
Summary
SB 1308 would require Members of the California Legislature and designated legislative employees to attend an orientation course on the U.S. Constitution and the California Constitution, alongside existing ethics training. The course would be developed and conducted by the Legislative Counsel Bureau in consultation with the Joint Rules Committee, and would cover topics such as federalism, preemption, separation of powers, civil rights, the Bill of Rights, state constitutional rights and freedoms, and the roles of the three branches of government at both the state and federal levels.
The bill also sets timing rules for people who join mid-session: newly seated Members and newly hired designated employees would have to complete the course within six months. It creates two opt-out paths: a person may skip the course by demonstrating proficiency through an evaluation designed by the Legislative Counsel Bureau, or by being licensed to practice law in California.
Impact
SB 1308 would add Section 9025.5 to the Government Code and expand mandatory legislative orientation requirements. It would affect Members of the Legislature and designated legislative employees by imposing a new training obligation tied to constitutional law and governmental structure, while preserving flexibility for those with demonstrated expertise or California law licenses. The bill would also assign the Legislative Counsel Bureau a new instructional and evaluative role in designing, administering, and potentially testing the course.
Sentiment
The bill appears to have a mixed but generally supportive reception, with enough committee support to advance in some form but not enough for smooth passage. The recorded vote shows a majority in favor at one stage, but the bill also failed passage in committee on first hearing before reconsideration was granted, suggesting some members supported the concept while others were unconvinced or wanted further review. No committee transcript is available, so the available record indicates procedural movement rather than detailed debate.
Contention
The main point of contention appears to be whether it is appropriate or necessary to impose a constitution-focused training requirement on lawmakers and legislative staff, especially given existing ethics orientation requirements. Possible concerns include duplication of training, administrative burden on the Legislative Counsel Bureau, and whether the opt-out provisions are sufficient or too permissive. Supporters likely view the bill as a basic governance and civics measure to ensure legislative familiarity with constitutional principles, while skeptics may question its necessity or implementation details.
An act to add Section 37224 to, and to add Article 12 (commencing with Section 66095) to Chapter 2 of Part 40 of Division 5 of Title 3 of, the Education Code, and to amend Sections 11131 and 54961 of the Government Code, relating to holidays.
An act to amend Sections 51178 and 51181 of the Government Code, and to amend Sections 4202 and 4204 of the Public Resources Code, relating to land use.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.