California Assembly Bill AB998

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/25
• Refer: 3/10/25
• Report Pass: 4/10/25
• Refer: 4/21/25
• Report Pass: 4/30/25
• Refer: 4/30/25
• Refer: 5/14/25
• Report Pass: 5/23/25
• Engrossed: 6/4/25
• Refer: 6/5/25
• Refer: 6/18/25
• Report Pass: 7/16/25
• Refer: 7/17/25
• Refer: 8/18/25

Caption

An act to amend Sections 25160.8, 25217, 25217.2, 25218.1, 25218.5, 25218.8, 25218.8 and 25218.12 of of, and to add and repeal Section 25218.6 of, the Health and Safety Code, relating to hazardous waste.

Impact

By defining confiscated vape pens as household hazardous waste, AB 998 enforces the Department of Toxic Substances Control's regulations around hazardous materials. Schools and their contractors must adhere to strict protocols regarding the transport and disposal of these devices, which includes ensuring that the items are handled in closed containers and comply with weight and volume requirements. The bill requires an evaluation to be conducted by the department until January 1, 2029, to enhance the safety and convenience of managing confiscated vape pens and to inform future legislative needs.

Summary

Assembly Bill 998, introduced by Assembly Member Hadwick, addresses the management and disposal of vape pens confiscated by schools under California's hazardous waste regulations. The bill asserts that confiscated vape pens are categorized as household hazardous waste and maintains their classification when disposed of through authorized household hazardous waste collection facilities. This classification allows schools to transport these items under specific conditions designed to ensure environmental safety.

Sentiment

The reception of AB 998 is predominantly supportive from environmental groups and public health advocates, as it emphasizes proper waste management and protects community health. However, some criticism may arise regarding the practical implications for schools and their ability to handle the additional regulatory burdens. The sentiment reflects a balance between ensuring environmental safety and addressing the logistical challenges posed to educational institutions.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 998 include its prohibition against including vape pens in materials exchange programs, which some may view as an overly restrictive measure that limits reuse opportunities. Furthermore, the decision not to require state reimbursement for mandates imposed on local agencies raises concerns about the financial implications for schools that must comply with these new requirements. Overall, the debate highlights a tension between regulatory compliance and the operational feasibility for educational institutions.