An act to amend Section 65915 of the Government Code, relating to housing.
Impact
The proposed changes under AB 939 are designed to enhance compliance with existing housing affordability requirements while providing local governments with the framework needed to facilitate the development process effectively. By stipulating additional responsibilities for local agencies to implement these changes, the bill seeks to streamline the process of acquiring density bonuses, ultimately leading to increased housing accessibility for low-income and very low-income families across California's cities and counties. Local agencies are required to adopt ordinances to ensure this compliance, which could promote uniformity in application across the state.
Summary
Assembly Bill 939, introduced by Assembly Member Schultz, proposes amendments to the Density Bonus Law under Section 65915 of the Government Code, which aims to encourage housing development that includes affordable units for lower-income populations. The bill mandates local governments to provide density bonuses—an increase in the allowable number of housing units per acre—along with various incentives to developers who commit to constructing housing for very low, low, or moderate-income residents. It also allows for the participation of nonprofit housing corporations, which can benefit from the density bonus by purchasing unsold units designated for low-income families and making them accessible through below-market interest rate loan programs.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 939 appears to be largely supportive among advocates for affordable housing, who see it as a much-needed step toward addressing the housing crisis in California. However, there may be concerns from local governments about the potential strain on resources and additional administrative burdens placed on them to enforce the new requirements. The incorporation of nonprofit housing entities is viewed favorably as it broadens the spectrum of stakeholders engaged in combatting housing shortages and ensures units remain affordable. Nonetheless, some stakeholders may be apprehensive about how these changes might impact local governance.
Contention
Points of contention primarily revolve around the balance of authority between state mandates and local governance. Supporters argue that the changes will enhance the effectiveness of the Density Bonus Law in addressing urgent housing needs, while opponents might contend that it imposes undue pressure on local agencies without adequate state support or compensation for the costs incurred. There is also discussion regarding ensuring that these measures do not lead to negative implications for existing neighborhoods or local businesses, as the push for higher-density developments may alter community dynamics.