California Assembly Bill AB873

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/25
• Refer: 3/3/25
• Report Pass: 4/8/25
• Refer: 4/10/25
• Refer: 4/23/25
• Report Pass: 5/23/25
• Engrossed: 6/2/25
• Refer: 6/3/25
• Refer: 6/11/25
• Report Pass: 7/9/25
• Refer: 7/9/25

Caption

An act to amend Sections 1725, 1750, 1750.1, 1753, 1753.5, 1753.52, 1754.5, and 1755 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to healing arts, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.

Impact

If enacted, AB 873 is anticipated to modernize and clarify existing laws regulating dental practice in California, ensuring that dental assistants are adequately prepared for their roles while also increasing public health protections in the process. The bill outlines new timelines for training completion, requiring employers to confirm that their dental assistants complete infection control training within a defined period after hiring. This will enhance workplace safety and compliance with regulatory expectations regarding infection control procedures in dental settings.

Summary

Assembly Bill 873, introduced by Assembly Member Alanis, proposes significant amendments to the Business and Professions Code, particularly concerning the regulation of dental assistants and the requirements surrounding infection control training. The bill seeks to address access issues faced by dental professionals, including the establishment of virtual training formats for infection control courses that are currently not available in various parts of California, notably in rural and remote regions. Given the urgency of the situation, the bill is intended to take immediate effect upon passage to facilitate access to necessary training for dental assistants who could be exposed to infectious materials in their line of work.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 873 appears to be largely supportive among dental professionals and regulatory bodies who recognize the need for timely training and the modernization of outdated provisions in the Dental Practice Act. However, some concerns might arise regarding the logistics of implementing new training protocols and the potential for additional administrative burdens on dental practices, particularly small or rural offices which may already be operating under tight resources.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the requirement for a detailed application process for course providers wishing to offer training in infection control. There may be discussions regarding the sufficiency of resources for training providers to meet the new standards proposed, as well as the requirement for course evaluations by the Dental Board of California. Additionally, there are concerns about how the new requirements will affect dental practices in various regions, particularly those that have faced historical challenges in access to training and continuing education.