California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB634

Introduced
2/13/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
1/5/26  
Refer
1/5/26  
Refer
1/5/26  
Report Pass
1/13/26  
Refer
1/13/26  
Report Pass
1/15/26  
Refer
1/20/26  
Refer
1/22/26  
Report Pass
1/22/26  
Engrossed
1/29/26  
Refer
1/29/26  
Refer
5/6/26  
Report Pass
6/8/26  

Caption

An act to add Chapter 16.7 (commencing with Section 109024) to Part 3 of Division 104 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to public health.

Impact

If enacted, AB634 would add Chapter 16.7 to the Health and Safety Code, effectively centralizing the control over tianeptine and setting penalties for violations. Violators of this prohibition could face significant civil penalties, capped at $5,000 for the initial infraction and up to $10,000 for subsequent violations. This framework gives local law enforcement, such as the Attorney General and district attorneys, the authority to take action against those who breach the new regulation. The law would provide a legal pathway for consumers and authorities to address the availability of potentially harmful substances in the market.

Summary

Assembly Bill 634 (AB634), introduced by Assembly Member Jeff Gonzalez, addresses the regulation of tianeptine, a substance that has raised public health concerns. The bill prohibits any person or entity from manufacturing, selling, delivering, distributing, or offering for sale any product that contains tianeptine within California. This legislation aims to protect public health by controlling a substance that could be misused or have detrimental effects on consumers. The bill is a reaction to growing recognition of the potential risks associated with tianeptine in various products, including dietary supplements and pharmaceuticals.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB634 appears to be largely supportive among legislators focused on public health and safety. Proponents believe that it is essential to take strong regulatory measures to mitigate health risks associated with unregulated products. However, there may also be concerns regarding the balance of regulation and the potential impact on businesses that produce supplements or similar products. Critics might argue that such regulations could inadvertently restrict access to legal products that consumers could use responsibly.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the enforcement of the new regulations and the potential disproportionate punishments for manufacturers or distributors who may be unaware that their products contain tianeptine. There could be debate over whether the civil penalties are too harsh, particularly for first-time violators. Lawmakers might also engage in discussions about how this bill could affect consumer choice and the responsibilities of businesses in ensuring product safety while addressing public health concerns. Overall, the balance between public safety and economic impact will likely continue to be a focal point of legislative discourse surrounding AB634.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1148

An act to add Article 3 (commencing with Section 109015) to Chapter 15 of Part 3 of Division 104 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to product safety.

CA SB682

Environmental health: product safety: perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

CA AB641

Drug-Induced Movement Disorder Awareness Program.

CA AB2213

California Healthy Food Financing Initiative.

CA SB223

The Wildfire Smoke and Health Outcomes Data Act.

CA AB728

Skin care product sales: age verification.

CA AB872

Environmental health: product safety: perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

CA SB730

Product safety: consumer products: perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

CA AB356

An act to add and repeal Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 127575) of Part 2 of Division 107 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to health care.

CA SB89

Glyphosate: prohibition on sale.

Similar Bills

IL SB2087

STATES ATTY-PEACE OFCR-PRIVACY

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

TX HB2530

Relating to special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

LA SB454

Provides for a population based allocation of assistant district attorney positions in the state. (7/1/26) (OR +$397,950 GF EX See Note)

LA HB719

Provides relative to the number of assistant district attorneys in each judicial district (RE +$2,274,000 GF EX See Note)

TX SB888

Relating to the attorney general's defense of a district or county attorney against certain lawsuits in federal court.

TX SB2501

Relating to selection of an attorney by an indigent parent as attorney ad litem for the parent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX SB1026

Relating to the authority of the attorney general to prosecute criminal offenses prescribed by the election laws of this state.