California Assembly Bill AB561

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/12/25
• Refer: 3/3/25
• Report Pass: 3/10/25
• Refer: 3/11/25
• Report Pass: 3/26/25
• Refer: 3/26/25
• Refer: 4/30/25
• Report Pass: 5/23/25
• Engrossed: 6/2/25
• Refer: 6/3/25
• Refer: 6/11/25
• Report Pass: 7/9/25
• Refer: 7/10/25
• Report Pass: 8/18/25
• Refer: 8/18/25
• Refer: 8/25/25
• Report Pass: 8/29/25
• Enrolled: 9/10/25
• Chaptered: 10/3/25
• Passed: 10/3/25

Caption

An act to amend Section 527.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to amend Sections 6307 and 6308 of the Family Code, to amend Section 6103.2 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 15657.03 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to restraining orders.

Impact

By enabling electronic filings without fees for victims, AB 561 aims to make seeking restraining orders more accessible, particularly for those experiencing harassment or domestic violence. The ability to appear remotely at hearings is a significant improvement, as it mitigates the intimidation that many victims may feel when entering a courtroom. Furthermore, the requirements for elder or dependent adults to receive timely notification of hearings and the option for remote participation is specifically designed to protect some of the most vulnerable members of the community.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 561, introduced by Quirk-Silva, amends several sections of the California Code relating to restraining orders to modernize and enhance the process by which victims can seek protection. This bill allows for the electronic submission of petitions for harassment and protective orders, streamlining the filing process and reducing barriers for victims who may be hesitant to navigate the court system. The new provisions will take effect starting January 1, 2027, which will also include the development of comprehensive guidelines by each county for electronic filings and remote court appearances.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 561 appears to be largely positive, with support from various advocacy groups for victims of harassment and domestic violence. The changes are seen as progressive steps towards ensuring that legal barriers do not prevent victims from receiving protection. However, there remains a discussion among critics about the adequacy of remote processes and whether they fully replace the immediacy and seriousness that in-person appearances can convey.

Contention

One notable point of contention may arise around the shift to electronic processes, particularly concerning the effectiveness in terms of service of documentation and the potential for individuals to evade service. While the bill allows alternative methods of service if personal service proves unfeasible, critics may question the implications of these methods on due process and the rights of the accused. The balance between protecting victims and safeguarding the rights of the accused in a new electronic framework will likely be a topic of ongoing debate.