California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB374

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Engrossed
5/8/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
5/8/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Refer
5/21/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Report Pass
6/11/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Refer
6/23/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/10/25  
Enrolled
9/10/25  
Vetoed
10/3/25  

Caption

An act to add Sections 45170 and 88169 to the Education Code, relating to classified employees.

Impact

The legislation will significantly modify existing state laws by formalizing the requirements for wage statements specifically for classified employees, who often fall under minimum wage protections. By instituting these reporting requirements, AB 374 aligns public sector employees with similar rights that have been available to private sector employees regarding wage information. It requires employers to maintain sufficient records related to these wages for at least three years, further promoting accountability and transparency.

Summary

Assembly Bill 374, introduced by Assembly Member Nguyen, aims to enhance wage transparency for classified public school and community college district employees in California. Beginning with the 2026-27 school year, this bill mandates that public school employers provide classified employees with an accurate, itemized statement at the time of each wage payment. This statement must include gross wages, deductions, applicable hourly rates, and other pivotal information, thereby ensuring employees possess a clear understanding of their earnings and deductions.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 374 appears to be positive among advocacy groups and employee rights organizations, as it addresses long-standing gaps in wage transparency that are crucial for classified employees. There is general support for the notion that better information can empower employees and enhance their ability to advocate for fair wages. Moreover, it reflects a growing acknowledgment of the importance of wage equity and visibility within public sector employment.

Contention

Notably, while the bill enjoys broad support, there may be contention regarding its implementation, especially from some school districts that might view the additional administrative burden as challenging. Opponents could argue that the requirements might complicate payroll operations or impose excessive workloads on already strained resources. Additionally, there may be some debate about the exemptions outlined in the bill, particularly concerning employees whose compensation structures differ from the general stipulations set forth in the legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB65

An act to amend Sections 44965, 45193, 87766, and 88193 of the Education Code, relating to employees.

CA HB3886

Relating to employment classification of certain strike-prohibited employees.

CA AB1247

Classified employees: school districts and community college districts: contracting out: training requirements.

CA AB2142

School districts: community college districts: short-term employees: classified service.

CA AB2293

Community colleges: classified employees.

CA AB378

Education finance: Classified School Employee Summer Assistance Program.

CA H0268

Amends existing law to provide that executive employees of the state of Idaho shall not be classified employees.

CA AB90

An act to add Section 76013 to the Education Code, relating to public postsecondary education.

CA HB191

Require school district, ESC teachers be paid at least $50,000

CA AB1111

An act to amend Section 17927 of the Education Code, and to amend Section 121 of Chapter 52 of the Statutes of 2022, relating to pupil transportation.

Similar Bills

CA AB378

Education finance: Classified School Employee Summer Assistance Program.

CA SJR2

Classified workers’ rights.

CA AB2142

School districts: community college districts: short-term employees: classified service.

US HR265

Condemning the Trump administration for the use of an unauthorized method of communicating highly sensitive or potentially classified information regarding a United States military operation via the messaging platform "Signal".

RI S0786

Prohibits prior authorization or a step therapy protocol for the prescription of a nonpreferred medication on their drug formulary used to assess or treat an enrollee's bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or schizotypal.

CA AB2293

Community colleges: classified employees.

WV HB5441

Reforming State Personnel System

WV SB924

Streamlining and reforming Division of Personnel systems