California Assembly Bill AB299

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/25
• Refer: 2/18/25
• Report Pass: 3/4/25
• Refer: 3/5/25
• Report Pass: 3/12/25
• Engrossed: 4/1/25
• Refer: 4/2/25
• Refer: 5/7/25
• Report Pass: 7/3/25
• Refer: 7/3/25
• Report Pass: 7/16/25
• Enrolled: 9/13/25
• Chaptered: 10/10/25
• Passed: 10/10/25

Caption

An act to add and repeal Section 1954.071 of the Civil Code, relating to tenancy, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.

Impact

By redefining the terms of tenancy for those displaced by disasters, AB299 aims to prevent potential conflicts between lodging operators and guests who might otherwise face eviction after 30 days under existing law. This bill is particularly geared towards responding to emergencies and aims to promote housing security for individuals who have lost their homes due to declared disasters. Furthermore, this legislation will aid local governments in managing the surge of displaced individuals in the aftermath of natural disasters, potentially impacting housing policies and tenant rights discussions in the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 299 addresses the conditions under which individuals displaced by disasters can occupy hotels or other lodges without being classified as tenants. Specifically, it amends the Civil Code to stipulate that a guest's continued occupancy of a lodging facility due to a disaster does not establish a new tenancy for unlawful detainer actions until the guest has resided there for 270 days. The legislation acknowledges that individuals affected by a disaster often require extended accommodation while their homes are being repaired or rebuilt, thereby providing them with a degree of security and stability during a vulnerable period.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB299 appears to be largely supportive among legislators who recognize the need for urgent accommodation solutions in the wake of disasters. Supporters argue it is a compassionate measure that acknowledges the challenges facing individuals forced from their homes. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential for abuse of the extended occupancy provision, where guests could remain in lodging indefinitely without the formalities of a tenancy, complicating the landlord-tenant relationship.

Contention

Opposition may arise primarily from lodging operators who fear the bill could disincentivize short-term rentals and damage their business models if guests stay longer than anticipated without rental agreements. Additionally, lawmakers and advocacy groups concerned about tenant rights may express apprehension that such measures may lead to abuse, with some arguing that more comprehensive tenant protections are necessary to ensure fair treatment in all housing situations, not just during emergencies.