California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB298

Introduced
1/23/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Report Pass
3/4/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Refer
3/5/25  
Report Pass
3/4/25  
Report Pass
3/4/25  
Report Pass
1/5/26  
Refer
3/5/25  
Refer
1/6/26  
Refer
3/5/25  
Report Pass
1/13/26  
Refer
1/13/26  
Refer
1/22/26  

Caption

An act to add Section 1367.55 to the Health and Safety Code, and to add Section 10123.187 to the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage.

Impact

This bill, if enacted, will significantly alter the financial landscape of health care coverage for young individuals in California. By eliminating cost-sharing requirements for in-network services, the legislation seeks to increase access to necessary medical treatments, including preventive care, which is crucial for the health and well-being of children and adolescents. Existing regulations under the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act and the Insurance Code will be amended to incorporate these new provisions, making it illegal for providers to bill for these services under the specified conditions.

Summary

Assembly Bill 298 aims to reform the health care cost-sharing requirements specifically for individuals under the age of 21. The bill prohibits large group health care service plans and health insurance policies from imposing deductibles, coinsurance, copayments, or any other cost-sharing mechanisms for in-network health care services provided to this demographic. The intent of this legislation is to ensure that young people have access to necessary health care without financial burdens, thereby potentially increasing their utilization of health care services during critical developmental years.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 298 appears to be predominantly positive among health care advocates and community organizations concerned with youth health. Supporters emphasize the importance of removing financial barriers to health care, particularly in the context of navigating the health system as a young adult. However, there may be concerns about the fiscal implications for insurance providers and whether this legislative change might lead to increased premiums or altered benefits structure as costs are redistributed to other policyholders.

Contention

Notably, there are potential points of contention related to the implementation of the bill. Critics may argue about the financial sustainability of such a mandate on insurance companies and the possibility of unintended consequences, such as increased premiums for other age groups. Additionally, the provisions surrounding high deductible health plans and their interaction with health savings accounts might create complications for both insurers and insured individuals seeking to navigate their health care options.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB363

Health care coverage: independent medical review.

CA AB577

Health care coverage: antisteering.

CA AB575

Obesity Prevention Treatment Parity Act.

CA AB574

Prior authorization: physical therapy.

CA SB386

Dental providers: fee-based payments.

CA SB535

An act to add Section 1374.

CA SB950

An act to add Section 1373.15 to the Health and Safety Code, and to add Section 10123.175 to the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage.

CA SB964

An act to add Section 1367.225 to the Health and Safety Code, and to add Section 10123.1934 to the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage.

CA AB1876

Health care coverage: nondiscrimination.

CA AB1887

An act to add Section 1342.76 to the Health and Safety Code, and to add Section 10123.1936 to the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.