California Assembly Bill AB2598

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/26
• Refer: 3/9/26
• Report Pass: 4/8/26
• Refer: 4/13/26
• Report Pass: 4/22/26
• Refer: 4/22/26
• Refer: 5/6/26
• Report Pass: 5/14/26
• Engrossed: 5/27/26
• Refer: 5/28/26

Caption

An act to add Section 1293.3 to the Health and Safety Code, and to amend Section 7600.5 of, and to add Section 7600.4 to, the Probate Code, relating to health care facilities.

Impact

If passed, AB 2598 will significantly impact state laws regarding the obligations of health care providers in California. The new requirement will formalize the notification process and impose civil penalties on facilities that fail to comply. Specifically, facilities that do not attempt to communicate with the known next of kin could face fines of $200 per day, accruing up to a maximum of $50,000. This measure seeks to enhance accountability in health care settings and protect the rights of patients and their families.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2598, introduced by Assembly Member Krell, focuses on the responsibilities of health care facilities related to notifying next of kin when a patient dies. The bill amends existing laws to ensure that hospitals and skilled nursing facilities make a reasonable attempt to notify any known next of kin about a patient's death and mandates notifying the public administrator if they cannot do so. This legislative action aims to enhance communication and ensure that families are informed in a timely manner during sensitive circumstances.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 2598 appears supportive among proponents who argue that timely notification to next of kin is a compassionate and necessary practice. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of penalties and potential administrative burdens on facilities, especially those operating with limited resources. As the bill progresses, stakeholders from both healthcare and legal sectors will likely discuss these implications to ensure the balance between accountability and operational feasibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise around the definitions of 'reasonable attempt' and the criteria for assessing civil penalties. Critics may argue that the bill could inadvertently penalize facilities that genuinely try to contact next of kin but face challenges in doing so, particularly in cases where family members are unreachable. Additionally, the absence of reimbursement provisions for local agencies could lead to debates about the financial implications of this legislation for health care providers.