California Assembly Bill AB2502

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/26
• Refer: 3/9/26
• Report Pass: 3/25/26
• Refer: 3/25/26
• Report Pass: 4/15/26
• Engrossed: 4/23/26
• Refer: 4/23/26

Caption

An act to add Section 23152.1 to the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.

Impact

The implications of AB 2502 are far-reaching as it expands the scope of existing DUI laws to include automated driving conditions. This means that if an automated vehicle makes a slight volitional movement while a driver is under the influence, it could result in legal penalties similar to those for traditional DUI violations. The bill seeks to adapt California's legal framework to the realities of increasing vehicle automation, potentially impacting law enforcement practices and the prosecution of DUI cases.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2502, introduced by Assembly Member Pellerin, is a significant amendment to the California Vehicle Code that addresses issues related to driving under the influence (DUI) with specific reference to vehicles equipped with driving automation technology. The bill proposes to define 'drive' such that it includes the volitional movement of vehicles that have specified levels of automation (Levels 0 to 3, as defined by the Society of Automotive Engineers). This change is particularly pertinent in the context of emerging technologies in vehicle automation, aiming to ensure that DUI laws encompass these new driving dynamics.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention surrounding AB 2502 pertains to whether the expansion of DUI laws to automated driving setups is necessary, or if it might create confusion regarding the responsibilities of individuals in control of automated vehicles. Critics may argue that such legislation could lead to unintended consequences, particularly for users of vehicles that are only partially automated, blurring the line of accountability for driving offenses.

Fiscal consideration

Furthermore, the bill explicitly states that no reimbursement is required for any costs incurred due to this legislation since it primarily changes the definitions relevant to existing crimes. This provision could lessen the financial impact on local agencies or school districts, which might be a point of support for proponents of the bill aimed at easing fiscal burdens on public entities.