California Assembly Bill AB2460

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/26
• Refer: 3/19/26
• Report Pass: 3/19/26
• Refer: 3/23/26
• Report Pass: 4/6/26
• Refer: 4/7/26
• Report Pass: 4/16/26
• Refer: 4/16/26
• Refer: 5/6/26
• Report Pass: 5/14/26
• Engrossed: 5/27/26
• Refer: 5/28/26

Caption

An act to add Article 1.3 (commencing with Section 49417.5) to Chapter 9 of Part 27 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Education Code, Sections 49428.12 and 49428.3 to the Education Code, relating to pupil health.

Impact

If passed, AB 2460 would require local educational agencies to adopt revised referral policies for behavioral health, with specific attention to the effects of local emergencies related to immigration enforcement. This could significantly change how schools approach mental health issues, fostering environments that prioritize the well-being of all students, particularly those affected by the fear of deportation or family separation. The bill emphasizes the need for culturally responsive care and partnerships with community-based organizations to support students and their families during stressful periods.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2460, introduced by Assembly Member Celeste Rodriguez, seeks to enhance mental health support for students within educational institutions. It mandates the development of a comprehensive framework for pupil health that addresses the unique challenges faced by students in emergency situations, particularly those arising from immigration enforcement. The bill calls for the State Department of Education, in collaboration with relevant stakeholders, to provide guidelines that ensure equitable access to mental health resources tailored for crises impacting students, especially those from immigrant families.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2460 appears to be generally positive among those advocating for mental health resources in schools, as it aligns with a growing recognition of the importance of mental health in educational settings. Supporters argue it addresses critical needs that have been exacerbated by recent immigration policies and enforcement activities, restoring a sense of safety and support for vulnerable student populations. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of these mandates and the resources required from local agencies to execute the proposed changes effectively.

Contention

Some points of contention include potential apprehensions from school districts about the additional responsibilities and costs imposed by the bill. Local agencies might express concerns regarding their capacity to comply with new mandates, particularly in delineating policies that integrate mental health supports into existing educational frameworks. Moreover, the bill's focus on immigration-related emergencies could elicit debate on how schools navigate the broader implications of enforcement activities on their student populations, prompting discussions on balancing legal obligations with educational commitments.