California Assembly Bill AB2402

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/26
• Refer: 3/9/26
• Report Pass: 4/9/26
• Refer: 4/13/26
• Report Pass: 4/14/26
• Engrossed: 4/20/26
• Refer: 4/20/26
• Refer: 5/6/26

Caption

An act to amend Section 1812.86 of the Civil Code, relating to health studios.

Impact

Should AB 2402 be enacted, it will distinctly alter the regulatory landscape for health studio contracts in California. By exempting multiservice health clubs from the existing financial limitations on fees, it creates a pathway for these entities to introduce varied and potentially higher pricing structures without the current restrictions. This shift could enhance competition and innovation among health and fitness providers, as clubs might introduce more varied and inclusive membership options. However, it also raises concerns regarding consumer protection, as individuals may face difficulties navigating and understanding new pricing structures without established price caps.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2402, introduced by Assembly Member Boerner, aims to amend Section 1812.86 of the California Civil Code regarding contracts for health studio services. The bill specifically targets the financial limits imposed on health studio contracts by exempting contracts with multiservice health club studios from the current maximum payment limits set at $4,400 for membership fees. These changes reflect a growing recognition of the diverse offerings multiserice health clubs provide, which include services beyond traditional gym offerings, such as on-demand classes, childcare, and coworking spaces, thus allowing for more flexible pricing models that can better accommodate these comprehensive services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2402 appears mixed among stakeholders. Proponents of the bill argue that it encourages fitness clubs to expand their service offerings, making health and wellness more accessible through diverse programming that meets the needs of a broader community. On the other hand, critics express reservations about the potential for increased financial burden on consumers who may become subject to higher fees without adequate protections in place. The debate reflects broader tensions between enhancing business operations for health clubs and ensuring consumer protections against exorbitant fees.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 2402 include concerns about consumer rights and transparency in pricing within the fitness industry. Critics argue that removing payment limitations could lead to exploitation, particularly among vulnerable populations who rely on these services. Establishing a clear definition of what constitutes a 'multiservice health club studio' is also a significant concern, as ambiguity in this definition could lead to loopholes that establishments might exploit to bypass regulations. As discussions unfold, lawmakers will need to balance encouraging business growth in the fitness sector while safeguarding consumer interests.