California Assembly Bill AB2362

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/26
• Refer: 3/23/26
• Report Pass: 3/23/26
• Refer: 3/24/26
• Report Pass: 4/6/26
• Refer: 4/7/26

Caption

An act to amend Section 39875 of, and to add Sections 39875.5 and Section 39881.5 to, the Education Code, relating to pupil transportation.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2362 would significantly modify the current regulations under the Education Code which govern pupil transportation by school employees. The bill promotes flexibility for schools by allowing greater hours of pupil transportation without extensive regulations that could limit participation in activities. It anticipates a potential financial necessity by establishing the Rural Transportation Safety Grant Program which would fund small and rural local educational agencies for necessary training and compliance for drivers, enhancing overall safety standards and ensuring that these agencies can provide adequate transportation.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2362, introduced by Assembly Member Hadwick, seeks to amend existing laws regarding pupil transportation within California's education system. The bill primarily aims to remove the 40 hours per school year driving limit for school employees who transport pupils while supervising them for field trips and extracurricular activities. In contrast, it maintains this limit for other activities, while raising it to 200 hours for smaller local educational agencies and frontier school districts. This legislative change reflects a broader intention to improve access to transportation options in rural areas, thus facilitating students' participation in school-related activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2362 has been largely positive among proponents who argue that the changes will support rural schools by allowing them more freedom in transportation logistics. Advocates praise the focus on increasing student access to educational opportunities through greater flexibility for school employees. However, there are concerns amongst some stakeholders regarding the safety implications of the proposed changes, particularly in terms of background checks and driver training since an increase in driving hours for employees could expose children to less regulated transportation environments.

Contention

Concerns have been raised about the balance between increased accessibility and the potential compromise on the safety of pupil transportation. The removal of strict hour limits, combined with provisions that allow more casual transportation methods without rigorous checks, ignites debate on whether these changes could inadvertently lead to unsafe transportation conditions. Opponents argue that while the goals of the bill are commendable, the implementation might weaken the existing safety nets that ensure the well-being of students during transportation.