California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2307

Introduced
2/19/26  
Refer
3/9/26  
Report Pass
4/6/26  
Refer
4/7/26  
Report Pass
4/14/26  
Refer
4/14/26  
Report Pass
5/6/26  
Engrossed
5/14/26  
Refer
5/14/26  

Caption

An act to add and repeal Section 101.16 of the Streets and Highways Code, relating to transportation.

Impact

The bill mandates that the California Department of Transportation evaluates the effectiveness of the pilot program, focusing on metrics such as congestion levels, operational efficiency, and vehicle emissions. A report must be submitted to the Legislature by January 1, 2028, detailing the outcomes and performance metrics achieved by the pilot program. If shown to provide measurable benefits, the bill authorizes the department to expand the program, potentially prioritizing areas with significant traffic issues.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2307, introduced by Assembly Member Sanchez, establishes a traffic signal synchronization pilot program in coordination with the Western Riverside Council of Governments. The bill allows this program to operate until January 1, 2032, and aims to evaluate a regional model for synchronizing traffic signals between state highways and local road systems. The overarching goal is to address traffic congestion and improve travel time reliability across the region, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of existing transportation infrastructure and reducing vehicle emissions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2307 appears to be generally supportive, as stakeholders recognize the important role that improved traffic signal synchronization can play in alleviating congestion and enhancing mobility. However, there may be concerns regarding the ability of local agencies to fund and implement the necessary studies and technology upgrades, particularly in times of fiscal constraint.

Contention

While the bill generally enjoys support, discussions may arise regarding the feasibility of implementation and the allocation of resources necessary for effective coordination between multiple local agencies. The expectation that these agencies conduct studies and upgrades at their own expense could raise questions about the implications for local budgets and resource management. Furthermore, some may debate the effectiveness of such pilot programs in producing tangible long-term solutions to traffic issues, potentially leading to differing opinions on the approach.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1145

An act to add and repeal Section 98 of the Streets and Highways Code, relating to state highways. An act to amend Section 21104 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.

CA AB334

An act to amend amend, repeal, and add Section 27565 of the Streets and Highways Code, relating to transportation.

CA SB78

Department of Transportation: report: state highway system: safety enhancements.

CA AB891

An act to add and repeal Section 91.

CA AB2454

State highways: report: southeast Los Angeles County.

CA AB1051

An act to amend Section 376 of the Streets and Highways Code, relating to state highways.

CA AB830

State highways: encroachment permits: relocating or removing encroachments: public utility districts: County of Mendocino.

CA SB1334

Route 59: adoption.

CA AB2168

An act to amend Section 2380 of, and to amend, repeal, and add Section 2382 of, the Streets and Highways Code, relating to transportation.

CA SB563

An act to amend Section 790 of the Streets and Highways Code, relating to state highways.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.